On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 15:42 -0800, Shawn Pearce wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Carlos Martín Nieto c...@elego.de wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:32 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I'll queue these for now, but I doubt the wisdom of this series,
given that the ship has already sailed
Hi all,
This comes as a result of the discussion starting at [0] about
git-push assuming that a server will always support thin packs. Most
out there in fact do, but this isn't necessarily the case.
Some implementations may not have support for it yet, or the server
might be running in an
Carlos Martín Nieto c...@elego.de writes:
Hi all,
This comes as a result of the discussion starting at [0] about
git-push assuming that a server will always support thin packs. Most
out there in fact do, but this isn't necessarily the case.
Some implementations may not have support for it
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:32 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I'll queue these for now, but I doubt the wisdom of this series,
given that the ship has already sailed long time ago.
Currently, no third-party implementation of a receiving end can
accept thin push, because thin push is not a
Carlos Martín Nieto c...@elego.de writes:
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:32 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I'll queue these for now, but I doubt the wisdom of this series,
given that the ship has already sailed long time ago.
Currently, no third-party implementation of a receiving end can
accept
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:25:50PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Support in the code isn't always enough. The particular case that
brought this on is one where the index-pack implementation can deal with
thin packs just fine.
This particular service takes the pack which the client sent
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Carlos Martín Nieto c...@elego.de wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:32 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I'll queue these for now, but I doubt the wisdom of this series,
given that the ship has already sailed long time ago.
Currently, no third-party implementation of
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
If we instead introduced no-thin, it is more like:
1. Receive-pack starts advertising no-thin (as dictated by
circumstances, as Carlos describes).
2. Send-pack which does not understand no-thin will ignore it and send
8 matches
Mail list logo
