Kirill Smelkov writes:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 01:52:22PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> >
> > Good to know there is no regression. It is curious that there is a
> > slight _improvement_ across the board. Do we have an explanation for
> > that? It seems odd that noise would be so
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 01:52:22PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:31:43PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>
> > Since 6b8fda2d (pack-objects: use bitmaps when packing objects) there
> > are two codepaths in pack-objects: with & without using bitmap
> > reachability index.
>
>
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:31:43PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> Since 6b8fda2d (pack-objects: use bitmaps when packing objects) there
> are two codepaths in pack-objects: with & without using bitmap
> reachability index.
Sorry, I got distracted from reviewing these patches. I'll give them a
Since 6b8fda2d (pack-objects: use bitmaps when packing objects) there
are two codepaths in pack-objects: with & without using bitmap
reachability index.
However add_object_entry_from_bitmap(), despite its non-bitmapped
counterpart add_object_entry(), in no way does check for whether --local
or
4 matches
Mail list logo