Re: [PATCH 0/6] Reroll of rr/triangular-push-fix

2013-06-24 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Junio C Hamano wrote: [PATCH 3/6] push: change `simple` to accommodate triangular workflows Sqaushed in the fix to keep the semantics of simple when used in the centralized workflow the same as before. Yeah, I'm worried about this as I pointed out earlier. I don't like erroring out

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Reroll of rr/triangular-push-fix

2013-06-24 Thread Junio C Hamano
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes: I hope (perhaps foolishly) to persuade you nevertheless. I fear that if this series solidifies before I get there, we'll be stuck with this stupid erroring-out behavior forever. I do not think it is stupid at all. 'simple' is supposed to be an

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Reroll of rr/triangular-push-fix

2013-06-24 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Junio C Hamano wrote: 'simple' is supposed to be an easy and safe default to help new people. Your original patch to change its semantics for the central workflow from the current 'make sure upstream is set and set to the same name' to 'anything goes' is making the mode more dangerous than