On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
For each contact information (either in the form of ``Name
user@host'' or ...)
in order to clarify that the two forms of input is what you call
contact
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
I find it easier than your original, but I do not know if you would
want to repeat the Name... or user@host at the end. It does not
seem to add much useful information and is distracting.
Next attempt:
For each ``Name $$user@host$$'' or
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
... Is it desirable to do so
or should the user have more fine-grained control? (xargs -0 comes
to mind when thinking of a null-termination input switch.)
For the purposes
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
+DESCRIPTION
+---
+
+For each ``Name $$email@address$$'' or ``$$email@address$$'' provided on
+the command-line or standard input (when using `--stdin`), prints a line with
+the canonical contact information for that person according to
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
+DESCRIPTION
+---
+
+For each ``Name $$email@address$$'' or ``$$email@address$$'' provided on
+the command-line or standard input (when using `--stdin`), prints a
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
For each contact information (either in the form of ``Name
user@host'' or ...)
in order to clarify that the two forms of input is what you call
contact information.
Is this easier to read?
For each ``Name $$user@host$$''
6 matches
Mail list logo
