Sverre Rabbelier writes:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
>>> We added rev_cmdline_info since then so that we can tell what refs
>>> were given from the command line in what way, and I thought that we
>>> applied a patch from Sverre that uses it instead of the obj
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
>> We added rev_cmdline_info since then so that we can tell what refs
>> were given from the command line in what way, and I thought that we
>> applied a patch from Sverre that uses it instead of the object
>> flags. Am I misremembering
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > If you changed your stance on the patch Sverre and I sent to fix this,
> > we could get a non-partial fix for this.
>
> This is long time ago so I may be misremembering the details, but I
> thought the ori
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> If you changed your stance on the patch Sverre and I sent to fix this, we
> could get a non-partial fix for this.
This is long time ago so I may be misremembering the details, but I
thought the original patch was (ab)using object flags to mark "this
was explicitly a
Hi Junio,
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> From: Johannes Schindelin
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] fast-export: make sure refs are updated properly
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:17:14 +0100 (CET)
> Message-ID:
>
>
> (which is $gmane/208946) that says:
>
> Note that
>
>
Felipe Contreras writes:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> ...
> I would like to understand that that even means. What behavior is
> currently broken?
I do not know if this is the same as what Peff was referring to, but
I found this message in the discussion thread during my
On 21.11.2012, at 06:08, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>
>> Never mind that others have said that that's not the current interface
>> (I don't yet see why it would be a good interface after a transition,
>> but maybe it would be). Still, hopefully that clarifies the intended
>
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:08:36PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> With such a one-sided discussion, I've been having a hard time
>> convincing myself if Felipe's effort is making the interface better,
>> or just breaking it even more for exist
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Max Horn wrote:
> 2) Some are interfaces to foreign systems (bzr, hg, mediawiki, ...). They
> cannot use sha1s and must use marks (at least that is how I understand
> felipe's explanation). These tools use import combined with either export, or
> push. Example
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:08:36PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> With such a one-sided discussion, I've been having a hard time
> convincing myself if Felipe's effort is making the interface better,
> or just breaking it even more for existing remote helpers, only to
> fit his world model better.
Felipe Contreras writes:
> They have been marked as UNINTERESTING for a reason, lets respect that.
> ...
> The current behavior is most certainly not what we want. After this
> patch, nothing gets exported, because nothing was selected (everything
> is UNINTERESTING).
The old behaviour was an in
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I see Felipe keeps repeating that there are bugs, and keeps posting
> patches to change fast-export, but I haven't seen a concrete "No,
> the reason why you see these problems is because you are not using
> the interface correctly; the curr
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Never mind that others have said that that's not the current interface
> (I don't yet see why it would be a good interface after a transition,
> but maybe it would be). Still, hopefully that clarifies the intended
> meaning.
Care to explain how the current interface is
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>>> Of course, transport-helper shouldn't even be specifying the negative
>>> (^) refs, but that's another story.
>>
>> Hrm, I am not sure I understand what you mean by this.
>>
>> How sh
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>> Of course, transport-helper shouldn't even be specifying the negative
>> (^) refs, but that's another story.
>
> Hrm, I am not sure I understand what you mean by this.
>
> How should it be telling the fast-export up to what commit the
> receivin
Felipe Contreras writes:
> Of course, transport-helper shouldn't even be specifying the negative
> (^) refs, but that's another story.
Hrm, I am not sure I understand what you mean by this.
How should it be telling the fast-export up to what commit the
receiving end should already have the hist
16 matches
Mail list logo
