On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
diff --git a/contrib/contacts/git-contacts b/contrib/contacts/git-contacts
new file mode 100755
index 000..9007bae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/contrib/contacts/git-contacts
@@
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
The author name and email can be grabbed from the blame output
without doing this (and the result may be more robust), but you
would need to read from the log message anyway, so I think this is
OK.
Note that the names and emails in blame output
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
The author name and email can be grabbed from the blame output
without doing this (and the result may be more robust), but you
would need to read from the log message anyway,
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
diff --git a/contrib/contacts/git-contacts b/contrib/contacts/git-contacts
new file mode 100755
index 000..9007bae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/contrib/contacts/git-contacts
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+#!/usr/bin/perl
+
+# List people who might be
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
- If the patch were prepared with a non-standard src/dst-prefix,
unconditional substr($1, 2) would call blame on a wrong (and
likely to be nonexistent) path without a useful diagnosis (the
invocation of git blame will likely die with no such
This script lists people that might be interested in a patch by going
back through the history for each patch hunk, and finding people that
reviewed, acknowledge, signed, or authored the code the patch is
modifying.
It does this by running git-blame incrementally on each hunk and then
parsing the
6 matches
Mail list logo
