Re: [PATCH] Remove the hard coded length limit on variable names in config files

2012-09-30 Thread Ben Walton
Hi Michael, The patch doesn't apply to the current master; it appears to have been built against master 883a2a3504 (2012-02-23) or older. It will have to be rebased to the current master. Junio had asked that it be based on maint so that's what I (thought I?) did. I'm happy to redo it

[PATCH] Remove the hard coded length limit on variable names in config files

2012-09-30 Thread Ben Walton
Previously while reading the variable names in config files, there was a 256 character limit with at most 128 of those characters being used by the section header portion of the variable name. This limitation was only enforced while reading the config files. It was possible to write a config

Re: [PATCH] Remove the hard coded length limit on variable names in config files

2012-09-30 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 09/30/2012 08:20 PM, Ben Walton wrote: The patch doesn't apply to the current master; it appears to have been built against master 883a2a3504 (2012-02-23) or older. It will have to be rebased to the current master. Junio had asked that it be based on maint so that's what I (thought I?)

[PATCH] Remove the hard coded length limit on variable names in config files

2012-09-29 Thread Ben Walton
Previously while reading the variable names in config files, there was a 256 character limit with at most 128 of those characters being used by the section header portion of the variable name. This limitation was only enforced while reading the config files. It was possible to write a config

Re: [PATCH] Remove the hard coded length limit on variable names in config files

2012-09-29 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 09/29/2012 12:19 PM, Ben Walton wrote: Previously while reading the variable names in config files, there was a 256 character limit with at most 128 of those characters being used by the section header portion of the variable name. This limitation was only enforced while reading the config