[PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Improve wording in a comment

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastian Schuberth
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com --- Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index c44eb3a..6f8ae23 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ check-docs:: esac; \ done ) | sort -###

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Improve wording in a comment

2015-02-05 Thread Junio C Hamano
Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com writes: Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com --- Is that an improvement? Is the plural of dup (used as an abbreviation of duplicate) dupes not dups? Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Improve wording in a comment

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastian Schuberth
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com writes: Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com --- Is that an improvement? Is the plural of dup (used as an abbreviation of duplicate) dupes not dups? My view

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Improve wording in a comment

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastian Schuberth
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com wrote: Is that an improvement? Is the plural of dup (used as an abbreviation of duplicate) dupes not dups? My view is that the abbreviation of duplicate is not dup but dupe, hence the plural dupes. For duplicate the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Improve wording in a comment

2015-02-05 Thread Stefan Beller
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com wrote: Is that an improvement? Is the plural of dup (used as an abbreviation of duplicate) dupes not dups? My view is that the