Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
---
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index c44eb3a..6f8ae23 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ check-docs::
esac; \
done ) | sort
-###
Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com writes:
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
---
Is that an improvement? Is the plural of dup (used as an
abbreviation of duplicate) dupes not dups?
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com writes:
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
---
Is that an improvement? Is the plural of dup (used as an
abbreviation of duplicate) dupes not dups?
My view
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Sebastian Schuberth
sschube...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that an improvement? Is the plural of dup (used as an
abbreviation of duplicate) dupes not dups?
My view is that the abbreviation of duplicate is not dup but
dupe, hence the plural dupes.
For duplicate the
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Sebastian Schuberth
sschube...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Sebastian Schuberth
sschube...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that an improvement? Is the plural of dup (used as an
abbreviation of duplicate) dupes not dups?
My view is that the
5 matches
Mail list logo