I have updated the commit message with some text why I do not think
this change is critical for this case.
I will resend v2 of the patch series in a little while.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 09:46 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
>> Switch to using ref tran
Michael Haggerty writes:
> On 04/17/2014 09:46 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
>> Switch to using ref transactions in walker_fetch(). As part of the
>> refactoring
>> to use ref transactions we also fix a potential memory leak where in the
>> original code if write_ref_sha1() would fail we would end
On 04/17/2014 09:46 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> Switch to using ref transactions in walker_fetch(). As part of the refactoring
> to use ref transactions we also fix a potential memory leak where in the
> original code if write_ref_sha1() would fail we would end up returning from
> the function wit
Switch to using ref transactions in walker_fetch(). As part of the refactoring
to use ref transactions we also fix a potential memory leak where in the
original code if write_ref_sha1() would fail we would end up returning from
the function without free()ing the msg string.
Signed-off-by: Ronnie S
4 matches
Mail list logo