Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] Remove assumptions about each_ref_fn arg lifetimes

2013-05-30 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 05/29/2013 10:25 AM, Thomas Rast wrote: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes: I read the entire series on Monday, and give it an Ack at maybe 90% confidence level -- sorry, I was short on caffeine and sleep ;-) Thanks very much. I'll buy you a coffee the next time I see you :-)

Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] Remove assumptions about each_ref_fn arg lifetimes

2013-05-29 Thread Thomas Rast
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes: I read the entire series on Monday, and give it an Ack at maybe 90% confidence level -- sorry, I was short on caffeine and sleep ;-) I meant to verify this assertion: I did a manual audit of the 50 (!) functions that are used as an each_ref_fn

[PATCH v2 00/25] Remove assumptions about each_ref_fn arg lifetimes

2013-05-25 Thread Michael Haggerty
This is version two of the patch series. Aside from addressing Junio's comments about the first version, it goes significantly further than v1: I did a manual audit of the 50 (!) functions that are used as an each_ref_fn callback to the for_each_ref()-style functions. (I hope I haven't missed