Michael Haggerty writes:
> Given that ref-iterators is in next but also that you will soon be
> rewinding next, would you like these tweaks as a re-roll of the branch,
> as fixup patches to squash on top, or as a new patch series to be
> administered separately?
A re-roll
On 06/09/2016 01:46 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 06/07/2016 07:13 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> [...]
> Thanks for all your great comments!
Junio,
Given that ref-iterators is in next but also that you will soon be
rewinding next, would you like these tweaks as a re-roll of the branch,
as fixup
On 06/07/2016 07:13 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>> The iterator interface is modeled on that for references, though no
>> vtable is necessary because there is (so far?) only one type of
>> dir_iterator.
>> [...]
>
>
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> The iterator interface is modeled on that for references, though no
> vtable is necessary because there is (so far?) only one type of
> dir_iterator.
> [...]
Some minor comments below, though probably nothing
The iterator interface is modeled on that for references, though no
vtable is necessary because there is (so far?) only one type of
dir_iterator.
There are obviously a lot of features that could easily be added to this
class:
* Skip/include directory paths in the iteration
* Shallow/deep
5 matches
Mail list logo