Re: [Q] Comparing differences introduced by two commits?

2012-08-24 Thread Brian Foster
On Wednesday 22-August-2012 10:55:29 Jonathan del Strother wrote:
 On 22 August 2012 17:58, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
  Jonathan del Strother maill...@steelskies.com writes:
  On 22 August 2012 13:10, Brian Foster brian.fos...@maxim-ic.com wrote:
  ...
   In the past I've done:
 
  diff (git show A) (git show B)
 
   which produces rather messy output [...]
 
  Isn't this what interdiff is for?

 I'd never(?) heard of interdiff(1) —  THANKS!
 With my current problem it produces  (1) Some false results,
 and  (2) Gets enough patch-rejects so as to be useful only
 in getting a 10km-high overview.   Nonetheless, it's a help.

   Some searching hasn't found any suggestions I'm too happy
   with, albeit I've very possibly overlooked something.
 
  What about cherry picking B onto A, then showing the cherry-picked commit?
 [...]
  I often do
 
  git checkout A^
  git cherry-pick B
  git diff A
 
  when queuing an updated patch.

 This works fairly well.  I get conflicts (not surprising),
 which _probably_ corrolate rather well to the interdiff
 patch-rejects (not checked), but the advantage here is I
 can easily see what's going on (what the conflict _is_).

 Neither compares commit-comments, but that is a obviously
 a scriptable problem.

 As it so happens, it turns out my number of A/B pairs is
 rather less than expected (c.50 not the estimated c.90),
 of which c.10 get cherry-pick conflicts.  So the problem
 is now looking quite tractable.  Thanks for the help!

cheers,
-blf-

-- 
Brian Foster
Principal MTS, Software|  La Ciotat, France
Maxim Integrated Products  |  Web:  http://www.maxim-ic.com/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Q] Comparing differences introduced by two commits?

2012-08-22 Thread Brian Foster

Hello,

 I have two commits A and B.  They are on separate branches.
 Commit A is a older version of B.  I want to see what, if
 any, differences there are between what commit A changes
 and what commit B changes.  (The relative positions of
 two commits may also differ in the two branches; that is, 
 there may have been some commit re-ordering.)

 Ideally, the contents of the commit-message are also taken
 into account (albeit things like the commit-Id, dates, and
 so on will differ and therefore should be ignored).

 I realize the history leading up to each commit can itself
 cause what the commits change to differ, even if the net
 result of the two commits is the same.  For my purposes,
 this is a noise issue, and I'm happy to consider A and B 
 as not causing the same changes (i.e., as being different),
 albeit if the only difference is the line numbers, then it
 would be nice to ignore that.

 In the past I've done:

diff (git show A) (git show B)

 which produces rather messy output but is Ok when dealing
 with just one or two sets of A/B commits.  I now have a
 large-ist set of A/B commits, and the above is impractical.

 Some searching hasn't found any suggestions I'm too happy
 with, albeit I've very possibly overlooked something.

 Any suggestions?
cheers!
-blf-

-- 
Brian Foster
Principal MTS, Software|  La Ciotat, France
Maxim Integrated Products  |  Web:  http://www.maxim-ic.com/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [Q] Comparing differences introduced by two commits?

2012-08-22 Thread Jonathan del Strother
On 22 August 2012 13:10, Brian Foster brian.fos...@maxim-ic.com wrote:

 Hello,

  I have two commits A and B.  They are on separate branches.
  Commit A is a older version of B.  I want to see what, if
  any, differences there are between what commit A changes
  and what commit B changes.  (The relative positions of
  two commits may also differ in the two branches; that is,
  there may have been some commit re-ordering.)

  Ideally, the contents of the commit-message are also taken
  into account (albeit things like the commit-Id, dates, and
  so on will differ and therefore should be ignored).

  I realize the history leading up to each commit can itself
  cause what the commits change to differ, even if the net
  result of the two commits is the same.  For my purposes,
  this is a noise issue, and I'm happy to consider A and B
  as not causing the same changes (i.e., as being different),
  albeit if the only difference is the line numbers, then it
  would be nice to ignore that.

  In the past I've done:

 diff (git show A) (git show B)

  which produces rather messy output but is Ok when dealing
  with just one or two sets of A/B commits.  I now have a
  large-ist set of A/B commits, and the above is impractical.

  Some searching hasn't found any suggestions I'm too happy
  with, albeit I've very possibly overlooked something.

What about cherry picking B onto A, then showing the cherry-picked commit?

Off the top of my head :

git checkout A
git cherry-pick B
git show HEAD

-Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [Q] Comparing differences introduced by two commits?

2012-08-22 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jonathan del Strother maill...@steelskies.com writes:

 On 22 August 2012 13:10, Brian Foster brian.fos...@maxim-ic.com wrote:
 ...
  In the past I've done:

 diff (git show A) (git show B)

  which produces rather messy output but is Ok when dealing
  with just one or two sets of A/B commits.  I now have a
  large-ist set of A/B commits, and the above is impractical.

Isn't this what interdiff is for?

  Some searching hasn't found any suggestions I'm too happy
  with, albeit I've very possibly overlooked something.

 What about cherry picking B onto A, then showing the cherry-picked commit?

 Off the top of my head :

 git checkout A
 git cherry-pick B
 git show HEAD

Wouldn't you see a lot of needless conflicts while doing such a cherry-pick?

I often do

git checkout A^
git cherry-pick B
git diff A

when queuing an updated patch.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [Q] Comparing differences introduced by two commits?

2012-08-22 Thread Jonathan del Strother
On 22 August 2012 17:58, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
 Jonathan del Strother maill...@steelskies.com writes:

 On 22 August 2012 13:10, Brian Foster brian.fos...@maxim-ic.com wrote:
 ...
  In the past I've done:

 diff (git show A) (git show B)

  which produces rather messy output but is Ok when dealing
  with just one or two sets of A/B commits.  I now have a
  large-ist set of A/B commits, and the above is impractical.

 Isn't this what interdiff is for?

  Some searching hasn't found any suggestions I'm too happy
  with, albeit I've very possibly overlooked something.

 What about cherry picking B onto A, then showing the cherry-picked commit?

 Off the top of my head :

 git checkout A
 git cherry-pick B
 git show HEAD

 Wouldn't you see a lot of needless conflicts while doing such a cherry-pick?

 I often do

 git checkout A^
 git cherry-pick B
 git diff A

 when queuing an updated patch.


True.  That sounds a better solution.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html