William Giokas wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:24:51PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > William Giokas wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:09:55PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > > > As you say, it's perfectly OK.
> > >
> > > But wrong. Yes, it works, but it's not how it should be don
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:24:51PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> William Giokas wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:09:55PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > > As you say, it's perfectly OK.
> >
> > But wrong. Yes, it works, but it's not how it should be done when we
> > have a code review s
William Giokas wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:09:55PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > William Giokas wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30:26AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > > > Why do we "import changegroup" unconditionally, even though it
> > > > is only used in the n
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:09:55PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> William Giokas wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30:26AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > > Why do we "import changegroup" unconditionally, even though it
> > > is only used in the new codepath meant only for version
William Giokas wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30:26AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Why do we "import changegroup" unconditionally, even though it
> > is only used in the new codepath meant only for version 3.0 or
> > higher, not inside the "if" block that decides if we need th
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30:26AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Torsten Bögershausen writes:
>
> > I did some testing with Git 2.0-rc3 + 58aee0864adeeb5363f.
> > The remote-helper tests for hg-git worked OK
> > with both hg version 2.9 and 3.0 under both Mac OS and Linux.
> >
> > Should we cons
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> It is time to catch regressions by asking wider audiences who do not
> normally follow Git development (i.e. those who are not the ones that
> follow 'master' and rebuild/install it once or twice a week for their
> daily use).
And you have one of those regressions in Git v
Torsten Bögershausen writes:
> I did some testing with Git 2.0-rc3 + 58aee0864adeeb5363f.
> The remote-helper tests for hg-git worked OK
> with both hg version 2.9 and 3.0 under both Mac OS and Linux.
>
> Should we consider 58aee086 to be included in Git 2.0 ?
It is way too late for Git 2.0, unl
(Please use reply-all and don't snip the important stuff)
On 2014-05-13 09.54, Charles Brossollet wrote:
> Le 12 mai 2014 à 21:37, Felipe Contreras a écrit
> :
>
>> Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
I'm using git 1.9.3 on Mac OS X 10.9.2, with hg 3.0 installed with brew.
It used to work
Le 12 mai 2014 à 21:37, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
> Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>>> I'm using git 1.9.3 on Mac OS X 10.9.2, with hg 3.0 installed with brew.
>>>
>>> It used to work before, on this same repository, since then git and hg were
>>> both upgraded.
>> In short: The remote helper of
Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> > I'm using git 1.9.3 on Mac OS X 10.9.2, with hg 3.0 installed with brew.
> >
> > It used to work before, on this same repository, since then git and hg were
> > both upgraded.
> In short: The remote helper of Git 1.9.3 is not compatible with hg 3.0
> You can eiher
> I'm using git 1.9.3 on Mac OS X 10.9.2, with hg 3.0 installed with brew.
>
> It used to work before, on this same repository, since then git and hg were
> both upgraded.
In short: The remote helper of Git 1.9.3 is not compatible with hg 3.0
You can eiher downgrade hg, or rebuild Git and cherry-
Hello,
I have the following error while pushing to an hg repository though the "remote
translator":
$ git remote -v
origin hg::ssh://charles...@hg.code.sf.net/u/charlesb05/lapdogapi (push)
origin hg::ssh://charles...@hg.code.sf.net/u/charlesb05/lapdogapi (fetch)
$ git push origin
Password:
se
13 matches
Mail list logo
