On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:04 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
>> I'd actually be inclined to say the opposite of what Junio is saying
>> there: that "-b" should blank the author field as well as the commit
>> sha1. I'd even go so far as to say that "-b" should probably be the
>> def
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Jeff King writes:
>
>> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:04:05AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> Arguably if the user explicitly limited the range, he knows what he's
>>> looking at. Admittedly, I don't know offhand which options _will_
>>> produce boundary commit indication
Jeff King writes:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:04:05AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Arguably if the user explicitly limited the range, he knows what he's
>> looking at. Admittedly, I don't know offhand which options _will_
>> produce boundary commit indications: there may be some without expl
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:04:05AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Arguably if the user explicitly limited the range, he knows what he's
> looking at. Admittedly, I don't know offhand which options _will_
> produce boundary commit indications: there may be some without explicit
> range limitation, a
Jeff King writes:
> I'd actually be inclined to say the opposite of what Junio is saying
> there: that "-b" should blank the author field as well as the commit
> sha1. I'd even go so far as to say that "-b" should probably be the
> default when boundary commits are in use. I cannot think of a tim
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 02:56:46PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> In short:
>
> - I am not considering nor proposing to change the default at all.
>
> - I have two choices, either change the behaviour of "-b", or
>introducing a new option (the latter includes "-b -b"); I am
>slightly i
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:32:01PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:52:38PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> ( 103)
> >> 7bbc458b (Kyle J. McKay 2014-04-22 04:16:22 -0700 104) test_exp
John Keeping writes:
> Yes, it's marking it as a boundary but I'm not convinced that's correct.
> Compare these two cases:
>
> $ git blame Makefile | head -5
> 7a3fc144 (John Keeping 2013-12-26 17:37:53 + 1) REL_VERSION = v0.2
> 5c9829f9 (John Keeping 2013-07-29 17:03:26 +0100 2
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:10:24PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 02:58:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > John Keeping writes:
> >
> > > On a slight tangent, I tried this in a fairly young repository and got
> > > this (with master at v2.0.0-rc2-4-g1dc51c6):
> > >
> > >
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 02:58:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> John Keeping writes:
>
> > On a slight tangent, I tried this in a fairly young repository and got
> > this (with master at v2.0.0-rc2-4-g1dc51c6):
> >
> > $ git blame Makefile | head -5
> > 7a3fc144 (John Keeping 2013-12-26 17
John Keeping writes:
> On a slight tangent, I tried this in a fairly young repository and got
> this (with master at v2.0.0-rc2-4-g1dc51c6):
>
> $ git blame Makefile | head -5
> 7a3fc144 (John Keeping 2013-12-26 17:37:53 + 1) REL_VERSION = v0.2
> 5c9829f9 (John Keeping 2013-07-29
In short:
- I am not considering nor proposing to change the default at all.
- I have two choices, either change the behaviour of "-b", or
introducing a new option (the latter includes "-b -b"); I am
slightly in favor of the latter, but not by a large margin.
- I have two choices, regar
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:52:38PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I am tempted to say "blame that is run without the --porcelain
> option is a end-user facing Porcelain, and people should not be
> reading its output in their scripts" and change the behaviour of the
> "-b" option to instead show som
Jeff King writes:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:52:38PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> ( 103)
>> 7bbc458b (Kyle J. McKay 2014-04-22 04:16:22 -0700 104) test_expect_...
>> ( 105)
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:52:38PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ( 103)
> 7bbc458b (Kyle J. McKay 2014-04-22 04:16:22 -0700 104) test_expect_...
> ( 105) test...
> 7bbc458b
Junio C Hamano writes:
> If you run
>
> $ git blame -L103,107 v2.0.0-rc0..v2.0.0-rc2 t/t9117-git-svn-init-clone.sh
>
> you will see something like this:
>
> ^cc29195 (Junio C Hamano 2014-04-18 11:21:43 -0700 103)
> 7bbc458b (Kyle J. McKay 2014-04-22 04:16:22 -0700 104) test_expect_.
If you run
$ git blame -L103,107 v2.0.0-rc0..v2.0.0-rc2 t/t9117-git-svn-init-clone.sh
you will see something like this:
^cc29195 (Junio C Hamano 2014-04-18 11:21:43 -0700 103)
7bbc458b (Kyle J. McKay 2014-04-22 04:16:22 -0700 104) test_expect_...
^cc29195 (Junio C Hamano 2014-0
17 matches
Mail list logo
