-Original Message-
From: Jacob Keller [mailto:jacob.kel...@gmail.com]
>Try a fresh clone with "git checkout --track origin/web_dev" and then a "git
>status -v" and let us know what happens. I suspect that older clones have the
>correct branches already setup for tracking, but the new
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Paul Williamson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We use git extensively on a number of repos. Recently, we have had a problem
> with one of them. This repo has a 'web_dev' branch. For copies of the repo
> cloned before a certain (recent but
-Original Message-
From: Philip Oakley [mailto:philipoak...@iee.org]
>Have you tried `git ls-remote` ?
>The `branch -r` just lists the local 'rtb's (IIUC).
Nice, I didn't know about that command - I tried it though and it does list the
remote branches correctly. I checked the commit
From: "Paul Williamson"
Hi,
We use git extensively on a number of repos. Recently, we have had a
problem with one of them. This repo has a 'web_dev' branch. For copies of
the repo cloned before a certain (recent but unidentified) time, we could
'git checkout'
Hi,
We use git extensively on a number of repos. Recently, we have had a problem
with one of them. This repo has a 'web_dev' branch. For copies of the repo
cloned before a certain (recent but unidentified) time, we could 'git checkout'
between master and web_dev and everything would be normal.
5 matches
Mail list logo