Re: htonll, ntohll

2013-11-13 Thread Andreas Ericsson
On 2013-11-05 01:00, Ramsay Jones wrote: [Note: I have never particularly liked htons, htonl et.al., so adding these htonll/ntohll functions doesn't thrill me! :-D For example see this post[1], which echo's my sentiments exactly.] That post actually contradicts your statement, as

Re: htonll, ntohll

2013-11-12 Thread Jakub Narębski
W dniu 2013-11-05 01:00, Ramsay Jones pisze: [Note: I have never particularly liked htons, htonl et.al., so adding these htonll/ntohll functions doesn't thrill me! :-D For example see this post[1], which echo's my sentiments exactly.] HTH ATB, Ramsay Jones

Re: htonll, ntohll

2013-11-06 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
( > > Anyway, I thought I would send what I have, so you can take a look. > Note, that I don't have an big-endian machine to test this on, so > YMMV. Indeed, the *only* testing I have done is to run the test added > by this branch (t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh), which works on Linux,

Re: htonll, ntohll

2013-11-04 Thread Ramsay Jones
eed, the *only* testing I have done is to run the test added by this branch (t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh), which works on Linux, cygwin and MinGW. [Note: I have never particularly liked htons, htonl et.al., so adding these htonll/ntohll functions doesn't thrill me! :-D For example see this post[1]

[PATCH] Test code for htonll, ntohll

2013-10-31 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
+33,8 @@ test_expect_success 'check for a bug in the regex routines' ' # if this test fails, re-build git with NO_REGEX=1 test-regex ' +test_expect_success 'test endianess, htonll(), ntohll()' ' + test-endianess +' test_done diff --git a

Re: htonll, ntohll

2013-10-31 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
On 2013-10-30 22.07, Ramsay Jones wrote: > On 30/10/13 20:30, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: >> On 2013-10-30 20.06, Ramsay Jones wrote: >>> On 30/10/13 17:14, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: On 2013-10-30 18.01, Vicent Martí wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Torsten Bögershausen >