[git-users] Re: How upgrade GIT Bash CLI

On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 7:40:45 AM UTC-7, Leonidas Savvides wrote: > > also how learn date/time last commit locally or remotely with GIT...? > > On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 2:07:38 PM UTC+3, Leonidas Savvides wrote: >> >> Basically to upgrade Git CLI bash to new version - I have to

[git-users] Re: How upgrade GIT Bash CLI

On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 4:07:38 AM UTC-7, Leonidas Savvides wrote: > > Basically to upgrade Git CLI bash to new version - I have to uninstall it > and install the new version? correct? > > Repositories are independent and should still work correct? > > ALSO SETTINGS OF REPOSITORIES KEPT

Re: [git-users] Re: 'git diff --name-status' reports difference for zero-byte file

There has been a recent thread on the main git mailing list concerning the effect of special filters, particulalrly the internal CRLF conversion, for getting a lot of checks 'just right'. Have a look for Torsten Bögershausen 's threads regarding CRLF handling etc. They may

[git-users] Re: 'git diff --name-status' reports difference for zero-byte file

I know the problem exists both on PC and Mac. My team can replicated on two different PC running Windows 7 and 10. For Mac, I am using El Capitan, the git version I am using is version 2.8.2. I am seeing that.I have also confirmed with a separate group that worked on LFS, they have to do

Re: [git-users] 'git diff --name-status' reports difference for zero-byte file

On Thu, 5 May 2016 08:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Jack Poon wrote: > We are working on an add-on over git using git filters, and testing > other tools that encapsulate Git. > > For some reason, git reports that there is difference for any > zero-byte when git filters are used. > > Is

[git-users] 'git diff --name-status' reports difference for zero-byte file

Hi, We are working on an add-on over git using git filters, and testing other tools that encapsulate Git. For some reason, git reports that there is difference for any zero-byte when git filters are used. Is this a feature or bug? What's the suggested workaround? Best regards, Jack -- You

Re: [git-users] How to implement White Label using Git

On Wed, 4 May 2016 17:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Moi wrote: > " > *These per-customer branches contain customer-specific customizations > and receive "integration merges" from the "pristine" branch when > needed > -- typically when a new bug fix or a feature gets implemented there. >

Re: [git-users] How to implement White Label using Git

…or merge, or rebase, whatever way you can get pristine’s changes to vendor. This all depends on your workflow. If you don’t have one, I would go with merges. Gergely Polonkai [image: https://]about.me/gergely.polonkai