>
> *...enjoy commands because it makes them feel like a hacker or something
> ;)*
It's true. The feeling of writing a few lines of code and see the "magic"
happen is much more enjoyable than pushing a few buttons. =)
I believe that before using a GUI or something that make life easier in
schedu
>As to "much faster than ...", you sound like a religious zealot, sorry.
why calls someone a nut (because they think a few clicks is faster than
typing dozens of characters) and then say sorry?
You sound passive-aggressive.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov <
flatw...@users
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 23:05:25 +0900
Max Hodges wrote:
> we are using https://bitbucket.org/ for our server.
>
> it's definitely much faster than command-line operations for adding
> files, staging, commits, merges, conflict solving, switching
> branches, etc. but I understand some people are just
we are using https://bitbucket.org/ for our server.
it's definitely much faster than command-line operations for adding files,
staging, commits, merges, conflict solving, switching branches, etc. but I
understand some people are just purists or enjoy commands because it makes
them feel like a hack
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:47:12 +0900
Max Hodges wrote:
> I think the best way to get more efficient with using Git is to simply
> start using a GUI. Then these operations are all just a matter of a
> few clicks.
>
> I use SmartGit myself. some others are listed here
> http://git-scm.com/downloads/
I think the best way to get more efficient with using Git is to simply
start using a GUI. Then these operations are all just a matter of a few
clicks.
I use SmartGit myself. some others are listed here
http://git-scm.com/downloads/guis
On Oct 24, 2012, at 11:33, Gabriel Lau wrote:
I was just
I was just trying to see if there was any way to automate the process,
because I still haven't mastered git.
But the command you told me already helped me a lot and saved me a lot of
unnecessary work, since I wanted to just switch between versions of a
project that was in production server.
No ne
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 12:48:33AM -0300, Gabriel Lau wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Konstantin. I did what you said and it worked as I
> wanted. Now I can switch between the branchs when necessary.
>
> I just have one more question: whenever I have to checkout between branchs,
> I have to input
Thanks for your reply Konstantin. I did what you said and it worked as I
wanted. Now I can switch between the branchs when necessary.
I just have one more question: whenever I have to checkout between branchs,
I have to input the commands that you showed me. Is there any way to
automate this proce
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 03:27:39PM -0300, Gabriel Lau wrote:
> In my case I use a bare repository. It was the easiest way I've found to
> manage the projects sent to the server.
> I start a new repository as bare and set it to put the files of the
> project in a specific directory in the server.
I
In my case I use a bare repository. It was the easiest way I've found to
manage the projects sent to the server. I start a new repository as bare
and set it to put the files of the project in a specific directory in the
server. But some of those projects I want to set a second branch to test
some t
3:42 PM
To: git-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [git-users] Re: Checkout a remote branch
Hello Thomas, thanks for the reply.
I found the site very interesting, explained quite a lot about the
functioning of git, but I found nothing about my problem.
To further clarify
In my case, I
Hello Thomas, thanks for the reply.
I found the site very interesting, explained quite a lot about the
functioning of git, but I found nothing about my problem.
*To further clarify*
In my case, I have two local branches: master and test.
I want to set the test as the main branch of my remote repos
On Sunday, August 19, 2012 4:20:11 AM UTC+2, Gabriel Lau wrote:
>
> Hi, its possible to do a checkout in a remote branch?
Generally, you can check out "anything" with Git, so yes.
> I want to test some things in a new branch and see how it works on the
> server without the need to merge with
14 matches
Mail list logo
