[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 11:35:11 AM UTC+5:30, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > > ok still no luck, i've cloned the tree to my local hard disk running >> ubuntu in vmplayer on windows. >> i see the performance has become worse, now git status it is taking >> more than >> two minutes. this

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

> > ok still no luck, i've cloned the tree to my local hard disk running > ubuntu in vmplayer on windows. > i see the performance has become worse, now git status it is taking > more than > two minutes. this is a little disappointment. does running from vm has > any drawbacks ? > There is a

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

On Jul 4, 1:27 pm, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > For comparison with a "real" file system, I just cloned the linux > repository, > which has 300k commits, 2,5 million objects and nearly 40k files in the > work tree, and there git status takes 1-3 seconds (ne

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

For comparison with a "real" file system, I just cloned the linux repository, which has 300k commits, 2,5 million objects and nearly 40k files in the work tree, and there git status takes 1-3 seconds (new iMac with mechanical harddrive, 7200 rpm). -- You rec

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

> > > Oh, and run on an unencrypted disk if possible. > > The file system is on NFS, i am not sure if it is > encrypted, as it is from my organisation i don't have > the means to change any of that. Ah, why didn't you say so earlier? NFSis n

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

On Jul 3, 2:16 pm, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > > Some things you can try: > > >    - Do regular work on a > > RAM-disk(if you have the memory to > > spare), but you must remember to always push to > >    a proper disk before restarting your computer

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

> > Some things you can try: > >- Do regular work on a RAM-disk(if > you have the memory to spare), but you must remember to always push to >a proper disk before restarting your computer >- Invest in a solid-state-drive

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 10:58:33 AM UTC+2, jack sparrow wrote: > > does it justify the git status to take more than a minute ? > I just asked around on the #git irc channel, and they confirmed that with 80k files, on a regular hard-drive, running git-status (cold = the first time), one minute

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

On Jul 3, 11:27 am, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 6:43:14 AM UTC+2, jack sparrow wrote: > > > btw, what's the command to display the statistics like the number of > > objects tracked, > > no.of files in the repo etc ? > > Find number of objects with: > > git count-obje

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 6:43:14 AM UTC+2, jack sparrow wrote: > > > btw, what's the command to display the statistics like the number of > objects tracked, > no.of files in the repo etc ? Find number of objects with: git count-objects -v Number of files you can find using normal unix comman

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

On Jul 2, 5:17 pm, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > On Monday, July 2, 2012 6:40:02 AM UTC+2, jack sparrow wrote: > > > i tried with git version 1.7.11.1, the issue still remains, > >  this is a build repo from my organisation, > > unfortunately i can't replicate the build > > with that many file

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

On Monday, July 2, 2012 6:40:02 AM UTC+2, jack sparrow wrote: > > i tried with git version 1.7.11.1, the issue still remains, > this is a build repo from my organisation, > unfortunately i can't replicate the build > with that many files. GIT_TRACE is not helping > either, it just throws the f

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

On Jul 2, 1:06 am, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > On Sunday, July 1, 2012 6:19:28 AM UTC+2, jack sparrow wrote: > > On Jun 30, 1:13 am, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > > > On Friday, June 29, 2012 2:29:59 PM UTC+2, jack sparrow wrote: > > > > > On Jun 29, 3:36 pm, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen >

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

On Sunday, July 1, 2012 6:19:28 AM UTC+2, jack sparrow wrote: > On Jun 30, 1:13 am, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > > On Friday, June 29, 2012 2:29:59 PM UTC+2, jack sparrow wrote: > > > > > On Jun 29, 3:36 pm, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen > wrote: > > > > It is possible to place a .gitignore

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

On Jun 30, 1:13 am, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > On Friday, June 29, 2012 2:29:59 PM UTC+2, jack sparrow wrote: > > > On Jun 29, 3:36 pm, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > > > It is possible to place a .gitignore file in each directory, and Git > > will > > > respect this. Therefore it check

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

On Friday, June 29, 2012 2:29:59 PM UTC+2, jack sparrow wrote: > > On Jun 29, 3:36 pm, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > > It is possible to place a .gitignore file in each directory, and Git > will > > respect this. Therefore it checks every folder for this file, but I > doubt > > that's wha

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

On Jun 29, 3:36 pm, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > It is possible to place a .gitignore file in each directory, and Git will > respect this. Therefore it checks every folder for this file, but I doubt > that's what is causing your performance problems. > > Can you please describe the size, numb

[git-users] Re: git status long time, gitignore

It is possible to place a .gitignore file in each directory, and Git will respect this. Therefore it checks every folder for this file, but I doubt that's what is causing your performance problems. Can you please describe the size, number of files, and what kinds of files there are in your repo