On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:16:08PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Does it seem incorrect to anyone else that git clean -X doesn't
delete all the files in your workspace that are considered ignored
by git status?
Well, reading the man page for `git clean` like a lawyer (my emphasis
below):
-X
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 10:05 +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:16:08PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Does it seem incorrect to anyone else that git clean -X doesn't
delete all the files in your workspace that are considered ignored
by git status?
Well, reading the man
From: Paul Smith p...@mad-scientist.net
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [git-users] git clean vs git status re .gitignore
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 10:05 +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:16:08PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Does it seem incorrect to anyone
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:41:46AM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 10:05 +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:16:08PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Does it seem incorrect to anyone else that git clean -X doesn't
delete all the files in your workspace that are
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 21:05 +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:41:46AM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 10:05 +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
So, it could be argued it does what it says, it removes all *files*
ignored by git, not ignored *folders*.
On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 06:50 +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
Is there a specific reason you aren't using a separate build
directory? (AFAIU this is the convention for CMake.)
Historical precedence. People are used to doing in-source builds and
some of our scripting for making releases, etc.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:06:23PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
One of the platforms I need to build on is Windows and we're using
cmake to generate MSVC project files. MSVC allows you to build one
of a small number of different types of output, such as Debug,
Release, etc. Additionally, we have
