On 1/2/11 08:27, "Konstantin Khomoutov"
wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:25:31 +0100
> Karel Vervaeke wrote:
>
> (Formatting sanitized.)
>
[...]
I can see various possible ways this might work, but I can't afford
to get it wrong, so I'd be grateful for a nudge in the right
direct
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:25:31 +0100
Karel Vervaeke wrote:
(Formatting sanitized.)
> >> I have a repository with commits
> >> A B C D E
> >> and a remote repository with commits
> >> A B C previously pushed and merged.
> >>
> >> Now I want to push D to the remote, but not E.
> >>
> >> I can see va
Another approach would be to create another local branch containing only A B
C D and then pushing that branch.
On 31-jan.-2011 19:56, "Konstantin Khomoutov" <
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:07:07 +
> Roddie Grant wrote:
>
>> I have a repository with commits
>>
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:07:07 +
Roddie Grant wrote:
> I have a repository with commits
> A B C D E
> and a remote repository with commits
> A B C previously pushed and merged.
>
> Now I want to push D to the remote, but not E.
>
> I can see various possible ways this might work, but I can't
