[git-users] User Restrictions....

2010-01-21 Thread Jeffda
Is it possible to allow commit, or patch apply, permissions for a user, but only if they aren't the ones that made the modification? For instance, if someone submits a patch to the user, the user will be able to apply the patch; however, if the user creates a patch, the user shouldn't have the

[git-users] Re: User Restrictions....

2010-01-21 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Jan 21, 10:23 pm, Jeffda daniel.viviot...@gmail.com wrote: Is it possible to allow commit, or patch apply, permissions for a user, but only if they aren't the ones that made the modification? For instance, if someone submits a patch to the user, the user will be able to apply the patch;

Re: [git-users] User Restrictions....

2010-01-21 Thread Jacob Helwig
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:23, Jeffda daniel.viviot...@gmail.com wrote: Is it possible to allow commit, or patch apply, permissions for a user, but only if they aren't the ones that made the modification? For instance, if someone submits a patch to the user, the user will be able to apply the

[git-users] Re: User Restrictions....

2010-01-21 Thread Jeffrey
You might want to do this in the form of requiring signed-off-by lines. That'd be a relatively easy thing to check for in an update hook; sure, they're a little easier to fake than authorship information, but they permanently record the information. On Jan 21, 5:14 pm, Jeffda