Re: [git-users] SVN vs GIT
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 06:02, Andrew Gray andrew.paul.g...@gmail.com wrote: The pushback I am getting is: 1. What does GIT give me that I don't get with SVN 2. It is just another thing I have to learn and why should I when I don't know what benefit I get. It is very common mistake to try to convince regular developers to move to git. Such tactic will not succeed usually. Git does not have any benefits for the developer who just do svn co, svn up. Git's benefits are in the Team Lead and Release Engineer scopes. You just need to convince key persons to move to git. Other will thank you later when central repo will crash or you will guide somebody over series of git blame, git bisect, git rebase or git filter-branch. By the way there is very useful video for getting people know benefits of git better. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8 Tech Talk: Linus Torvalds on git -- Serge Matveenko se...@matveenko.ru http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/lig http://ru.linkedin.com/in/sergematveenko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
Re: [git-users] SVN vs GIT
Serge Matveenko se...@matveenko.ru writes: By the way there is very useful video for getting people know benefits of git better. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8 Tech Talk: Linus Torvalds on git That talk also highlights the most prominent disadvantage of SVN compared to git. You are ugly and stupid if you don't use git. You don't want to be ugly and stupid, and neither do you colleagues, right? There's also a tutorial depicting how to become pretty and smart: http://thetrilemma.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/git-for-ugly-and-stupid-people/ Every other argument like cheap local branches and stuff like that is subordinate to not being ugly and stupid. ;-) Bye, Tassilo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
Re: [git-users] SVN vs GIT
Your reply may have been a joke or it may not have been. Either way I feel your post added nothing of value to the thread and is therefore a waste of bandwidth. The link you posted may be of value, however I was offended by your comments. I use both git and svn and I am neither ugly or stupid. On Mar 8, 2012 5:53 AM, Tassilo Horn tass...@member.fsf.org wrote: Serge Matveenko se...@matveenko.ru writes: By the way there is very useful video for getting people know benefits of git better. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8 Tech Talk: Linus Torvalds on git That talk also highlights the most prominent disadvantage of SVN compared to git. You are ugly and stupid if you don't use git. You don't want to be ugly and stupid, and neither do you colleagues, right? There's also a tutorial depicting how to become pretty and smart: http://thetrilemma.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/git-for-ugly-and-stupid-people/ Every other argument like cheap local branches and stuff like that is subordinate to not being ugly and stupid. ;-) Bye, Tassilo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
Re: [git-users] SVN vs GIT
I wasn't trying to sound like I was taking the statement personally. Had it been made clear that the text of the post was a joke instead of being taken either way I would have a different outlook On Mar 8, 2012 6:52 AM, tombert tomb...@live.at wrote: On Thursday, March 8, 2012 2:13:03 PM UTC+1, Chris Stone wrote: Your reply may have been a joke or it may not have been. Either way I feel your post added nothing of value to the thread and is therefore a waste of bandwidth. The link you posted may be of value, however I was offended by your comments. I use both git and svn and I am neither ugly or stupid. I don't think the statement ... You are ugly and stupid if you don't use git ... was meant personally - it was a generallization like the one you see on advertising spots: If you eat this *yoghurt *you will get pretty and healthy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/git-users/-/B_apgpQN860J. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
Re: [git-users] SVN vs GIT
Chris Stone nightshade1...@gmail.com writes: Hi Chris, Your reply may have been a joke or it may not have been. Either way I feel your post added nothing of value to the thread and is therefore a waste of bandwidth. The link you posted may be of value, however I was offended by your comments. I don't deserve any credits on this statement. In the google tech talk that was linked in the message I replied to, Linus makes this statement with a twinkle. Therefore, I started my reply with That talk... to make the context clear. Sorry, if that wasn't clear enough. I use both git and svn and I am neither ugly or stupid. So do I, and clearly the used VCS has no immediate effect on beauty or wisdom. I think we can agree on that. Bye, Tassilo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
Re: [git-users] SVN vs GIT
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:40 AM, radovan bast radovan.b...@uit.no wrote: - you get backup for free Could you explain this point? I would have made that argument for SVN/CVS, really any centralized system. In git, you're dealing with (possibly numerous) repositories on different machines. Unless all the machines on which they're located are backed up, you don't have backup (unless you push/pull every commit to an upstream repository on a backed-up machine, such as github). Using SVN, where the SVN repository is (typically) housed on a server that is backed up, every commit is an automatic backup. In git, it's not, unless you do a commit+push every time you'd do a commit in SVN. - Godmar -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
Re: [git-users] Re: git svn fetch
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 01:46:42PM -0800, AdrianH wrote: [...] H, seems that I just needed --username on initial fetch. Doesn't ask when I do git svn rebase. This is expected behaviour, indeed. A bit confusing. This is my first experience using git-svn. I'd not say it's confusing: it's how plain Subversion client behaves, so if you used it, you'd feel right at home with git-svn as well. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
[git-users] Re: SVN vs GIT
On Friday, March 9, 2012 8:44:42 AM UTC+5:30, Jeenu wrote: Next steps would include a demo as to how SVN would save their day by helping to recovering from mistakes Of course I meant Git. What was I thinking? -- Jeenu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/git-users/-/bXC04VTnBpgJ. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.