[git-users] any suggestions for pruning all upstream branches after a github fork?
Basically, I'd like to delete every branch in my fork of an upstream repo that is the same as an upstream branch. With sufficient scripting, I can write something to enumerate and compare branch heads, but I'm hoping someone knows of a tool that does this, or can point me to some useful git plumbing to help. github, for reasons lost to me, gives you a snapshot of all upstream branches at time of fork, but not any new branches created upstream, nor does it ever delete them when upstream deletes, or give any way to synchronize... not to complain. :-) Cheers, Sam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [git-users] git rev-list --objects doesn't show moves
> From: Roman Neuhauser > > i'm writing an alternative to git-requet-pull. its output includes > a log of the commit range, eg: > > 1/3 76a23b86 043603cc README fancier > 162441d0 README > 2/3 87990615 ab984c9b ignore vim swapfiles > 32682119 .gitignore > 3/3 2c842d2d 2ab371a4 README is now README.txt > > each commit is represented by a line giving its position in the range, > the treeid, the commitid and the subject line, followed by a series of > lines identifying affected files, each line with the objectid and path. > > i'm gathering the data with `git-rev-list --objects`, but it doesn't > mention objects that were moved (git mv) in a given commit; this is > visible in the last (3/3) commit in the example above: that commit was > just `git mv README README.txt`. > > i want the output to identify moves and copies. what are my options? > am i missing an option in git-rev-list(1)? should i use a different > piece of plumbing? The fundamental problem is that Git's data structures don't list moves and copies. For that matter, they don't list adds and deletes, either. As stored, each commit just tells the contents of the directory tree. What you appear to want is something that compares one or more commits and tells what the differences between them are. OTOH, is that what you *really* want? You say that you're "writing an alternative to git-request-pull". What is the definition of this output? What purposes do you expect the output to be put to? For instance, when you're pulling commit 3/3 from the remote, you don't *need* to download the blob that is the current contents of README.txt (and the former contents of README) because you already have it in your repository. So "git-rev-list --objects" doesn't list it. Dale -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [git-users] Can't clean "untracked changes."
On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 03:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Chris Carter wrote: > Windows 8.1 64-bit > git version 1.9.4.msysgit.0 > > I think I found a bug, but want to make sure before I actually say so. > > Background: I've been trying to compile Qt, and after doing so > decided I wanted to do it differently. The steps for this process > involve fetching the various Qt modules with git and then calling > `perl init-repository`, which changes the contents of the repo. (I'm > not certain it actually changes any files, but it definitely adds > several.) > > `git status` showed lines resembling this: > modified:(untracked content) Looks like you're merely looking at a submodule [1] -- see [2] for more info. If so, there's nothing to be aware of: if you really like to, add this directory to the ".git/exclude" file. You might want to try running git submodule status and/or git submodule summary to get the idea if your repository is really using submodules. 1. http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Submodules 2. http://stackoverflow.com/q/5126765/720999 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [git-users] Git on WD My Cloud Drive
> From: Kevin Brooks > > Has anyone set up a Git repository on a WD My Cloud Drive? If so I could > use some help. It would be more efficient if you told us what wasn't working as expected. Dale -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [git-users] Can't clean "untracked changes."
> From: Chris Carter > > `git status` showed lines resembling this: > modified:(untracked content) > > I found that these commands refused to properly restore me to a "pristine" > state, matching my remote: I'm no expert, but I'd say it's a design decision: If Git isn't supposed to track xyzzy, then it also shouldn't delete it. The usual way of getting untracked stuff into your working directory is by compiling things, and the usual way of getting rid of it is "make clean" or "make distclean". Dale -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[git-users] Git svn missing merge history after git fetch
Hello! I have a huge svn repo (about 3 GB checked out branch). So complete git-svn's clone is not an option in my case. I've decided to checkout by branch in case I need that branch. Here is my .git/config at start [core] repositoryformatversion = 0 filemode = true bare = false logallrefupdates = true [svn-remote "svn"] url = svn://repo.host/repo.path fetch = branches/branch1:refs/remotes/git-svn-branch1 Then I've added one more branch like this: [core] repositoryformatversion = 0 filemode = true bare = false logallrefupdates = true [svn-remote "svn"] url = svn://repo.host/repo.path fetch = branches/branch1:refs/remotes/git-svn-branch1 fetch = branches/branch2:refs/remotes/git-svn-branch2 During git svn fetch I noticed many messages that looks like this > Couldn't find revmap for branch svn://repo.host/repo.path/branches/branch1 > After that new branch has checked out with no merge history with branch1. Is there some way to fix merge history? Thank you! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[git-users] Can't clean "untracked changes."
Windows 8.1 64-bit git version 1.9.4.msysgit.0 I think I found a bug, but want to make sure before I actually say so. Background: I've been trying to compile Qt, and after doing so decided I wanted to do it differently. The steps for this process involve fetching the various Qt modules with git and then calling `perl init-repository`, which changes the contents of the repo. (I'm not certain it actually changes any files, but it definitely adds several.) `git status` showed lines resembling this: modified:(untracked content) I found that these commands refused to properly restore me to a "pristine" state, matching my remote: git checkout -- . git checkout HEAD git reset --hard git clean -xdf I also tried several variations on the above, but they didn't help and the listed versions seem to be recommended. TortoiseGit (1.8.11.0-64bit) reported a similar status, but was similarly ineffective at cleaning it up. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[git-users] First parent traverse problem and git rev-list --first-parent --ancestry (wrong?) behaviour
Hi there! I've been looking for a method to check whether one commit is reachable from another via first-parent traverse (without traversing tree manually) and I've stumbled into strange git rev-parse behavior. Imagine following git tree: --A---B---C-- \ / D---E In this tree commit B is the first parent of C. 1. How do I check whether B or E are reachable from C by first parent? *git rev-list --first-parent B..C *and *git rev-list --first-parent E..C* both return SHA of C 2. The issue I'm reporting is that *git rev-list --first-parent --ancestry-path* seems to behave wrong: *git rev-list --first-parent --ancestry-path E..C* returns SHA of C, while (according to *man git rev-parse)* "--ancestry-path" should restrict command output to commits being both descendants of E and ancestors of C. *git rev-list --first-parent --ancestry-path E^..C* returns zero commits which is correct. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[git-users] Git on WD My Cloud Drive
Has anyone set up a Git repository on a WD My Cloud Drive? If so I could use some help. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [git-users] git grep find files containaing A AND NOT B (in all lines)
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 5:09 PM, iv wrote: > git grep -l --all-match -e A --and --not -e B > > gives me files containing A and containing B or not > ... As I said, it works here. If you put together a minimal example repo and either share it somewhere, or bundle it and share the bundle, then send an email with the exact command line (I'm guessing 'A' and 'B' above aren't what you're actually searching for). Do that, and we might be able to help you further. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
