[git-users] Re: 2 Git servers
Teddy, Mirroring using Git w/Gitoite is fairly straight forward. Here is a link to the setup information: http://gitolite.com/gitolite/mirroring.html ~Bill On Sunday, January 5, 2014 7:45:43 PM UTC-8, Teddy - wrote: Dear git experts, May i ask for help on how to set the following? Goal : setup 2 git (gitolite) servers and regularly (auto script) sync them. Situation: *) 1 main git server in the main office in town A. *) There is a small office in town B : -) which has VPN link (slow and we dont want to rely heavily on the vpn connection) to main office in town A -) small grup of people -) we want to set up new dedicated machine as git (gitolite) server which will be the mirror of git server in main office (town A). It will have exact copy of all repos on server in main office. -) people in town B will use their local server to get the git repos *) Automatic and regularly, we want to sync ALL the git repos on both servers (any changes to any repo in main office, should be update to server in town B and vice versa). How to achieve this using the existing git feature (not using linux features such as rsync, sync script, etc)? Regards, Teddy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[git-users] Tracking # of Users
Hello, For anyone who is running their own Git server. Are you tracking the number of individual users on your system? If so how? Thanks, Bill -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
Re: [git-users] Re: gitg web interface
Thanks, I use cGit and really have not found a reason to replace it yet. However I now have a user who wants to do branching, merging and rebase functions through a web interface. I really don't like the idea but I do need to see if it's feasible. On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen tfn...@gmail.com wrote: Hum, well I didn't even notice this one last time I was looking through the alternatives. I was looking for some tool that was able to show side-by-side diffs. In the end we ended up installing Gerrit. We just use normal Gitweb as repo web frontend. I haven't yet found any good reasons to replace it (other than it's ugly). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
Re: [git-users] Re: gitg web interface
Yes, in very early stages of development. I think they are at version 0.8. On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen tfn...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, now I realized that gitg is like a desktop Git client. cgit on the other hand is a repository web frontend. These are two different animals. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
Re: [git-users] Re: gitg web interface
Yes, my thoughts exactly. The more that I think about it the less I like the idea. There is a reason they decided to go with clone, add, merge, commit etc in the local the local workspace and then push to the servers. On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen tfn...@gmail.com wrote: I think you've got a user with some bad ideas. Gerrit is for code-reviewing, accepting patches into a given branch. Yes, it can merge patches in, but it can't rebase. I would definitely not recommend Gerrit as a tool for branching, merging and rebasing. Your user just has to learn some Git, using either command line, or something like TortoiseGit (I'm assuming this is a Windows user). On Friday, May 27, 2011 7:22:46 PM UTC+2, mbaydiver wrote: Thanks, I use cGit and really have not found a reason to replace it yet. However I now have a user who wants to do branching, merging and rebase functions through a web interface. I really don't like the idea but I do need to see if it's feasible. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git for human beings group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
