[git-users] Re: Feature Request: Recognizing which code belongs together and in what file and file segment it belongs.

On Sunday, September 12, 2021 at 11:20:51 AM UTC+2 philip...@iee.email wrote: > Have you looked at the various --pickaxe and other file-following options > that can be set to different levels of similarity for the tracking of such > splitting and changing. > No. > Sometimes the real

[git-users] Feature Request: Recognizing which code belongs together and in what file and file segment it belongs.

Problem description: Background: Original fork does not want to split a file. Child fork does want to split the file and does so. Child fork can no longer benefit from changes from original fork. Problem: Git is incapable of transferring the changes of orignal fork file to child fork splitted

Re: [git-users] Re: Feature Request: Recognizing which code belongs together and in what file and file segment it belongs.

> > > Even better would be the compiler's parser for the code that would just > split out the major 'functional' segments that the code syntax already > defines. > > I agree with this assessment that having a compiler which can spit out meta data about code or some kind of API to understand

[git-users] Re: Feature Request: Recognizing which code belongs together and in what file and file segment it belongs.

mmand may have to be something different more advanced ??? Right now this seems to produce many merge conflicts and original files are imported back again, instead of split into already existing files... Bye for now. Skybuck. On Sunday, September 12, 2021 at 3:09:20 AM UTC+2 skybuck2000 wrote

[git-users] Re: Feature Request: Recognizing which code belongs together and in what file and file segment it belongs.

of a test to see what happens >From what I can tell it does the same thing more or less :) same merge conflicts... any suggestions how to do this better ? Bye for now, Skybuck. On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 4:41:05 AM UTC+2 skybuck2000 wrote: > Here is a "real-world" example:

[git-users] Re: Feature Request: Recognizing which code belongs together and in what file and file segment it belongs.

everything is =D I feel sorry for the man, he's making life very difficult for himself ! ;) Bye, Skybuck =D On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 4:41:05 AM UTC+2 skybuck2000 wrote: > Here is a "real-world" example: > > The original repository is this one: > https://github.com

[git-users] OT: Windows 7 + VMWARE15 + Windows 11 = LOST FILES !

Some of you may be in a complex environment like described in the subject line. I have reason to believe that there might be a file copieing problem between w7 and vmware and w11, thus before you start blaming GIT for losing files, first read carefully about the underlieing technology NTFS in

[git-users] Make git aware of which machine did the git commits ?

Hello, Right now I am working with git on two different machines: Windows 7 on real hardware. Windows 11 on a virtual machine. It would be cool if git could be made aware somehow on which machine the commits were made ? Right now the windows 7 machine uses Skybuck Flying Right now the windows

[git-users] Re: Make git aware of which machine did the git commits ?

On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 10:14:58 AM UTC+1 Erik Cervin Edin wrote: > Personally, I would use different email in the different environments and > take advantage of that (at least gmail) strips trailing parts of the email > > git config --global user.email foo+...@gmail.com > git config

[git-users] Re: how to remove two commits from a remote server

> > commit 89346f81fef27286bd3fb1ed3ddc94a6f3fb560d (origin/copyright, > origin/copy) > | Author: Uwe Brauer > | Date: Thu Nov 25 10:43:56 2021 +0100 > | > | Add patches to my new branch > | > | --HG-- > | branch : copyright > | > * commit 66380013003549a6851d4e110b29a5a439e05609 > |

[git-users] Re: git log --graph --all makes top line fall of screen.

Reversing the log is a possible solution, it does look a little bit weird, commit hashes at the bottom and commit comments at the top per commit, but could be interesting: git --no-pager log --all --graph --decorate --color=always | tac | sed -e 's/[\]/aa/g' -e 's/[/]/\\/g' -e

[git-users] Re: git log --graph --all makes top line fall of screen.

. The only thing I still dislike somewhat is the red it's a bit too dark for origin/remote and such... but liveable. Bye for now, Skybuck. On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 9:19:20 AM UTC+1 skybuck2000 wrote: > LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. > > POWERSHELL + GIT-POSH SOLVES IT !!! > > Q stays o

Re: [SUBVERSION?] (was: [git-users] A more advanced git system with working trees per commit.)

On Wednesday, December 29, 2021 at 2:57:31 PM UTC+1 o...@ucm.es wrote: > >>> "s" == skybuck2000 writes: > > > Now this is something to my liking. > > A git system where each commit and each branch has it's own working tree > ?! > > Why do

[git-users] Re: git log --graph --all makes top line fall of screen.

Oops messed up that important alias, remove one line: was: [alias] rlog = !"git --no-pager log --all --graph --decorate --oneline --color=always | tac | sed -e 's/[\\]/aa/g' -e 's/[/]//g' -e 's/aa///g' | less -r +G -X" should be: [alias] rlog = !"git --no-pager

[git-users] Re: git log --graph --all makes top line fall of screen.

pascalcoin change " into ' still don't work when rlog or olog types, output: Skybuck@DESKTOP-0T9FP82 MSYS /usr/bin $ alias cd..='cd ..' e:='cd e:' ll='ls -l' ls='ls -F --color=auto --show-control-chars' olog='git --no-pager log --all --graph --decorate --oneline --color=always | tac | sed -e

Re: [SUBVERSION?] (was: [git-users] A more advanced git system with working trees per commit.)

Path length hack for unlimited paths in windows 11. Could come in very handy especialy if I want to start using worktrees which I most likely will have to go do to prevent stupid files ending up from git switching and also reducing then number of switches. Apperently windows 11 is much worse

[git-users] git diff confusing: still showing ^M at end of some lines.

I am trying to get rid of ^M in repository cause it kinda looks weird and may screw up diffs, I am not exactly sure what is going on. git diff head~2 I see red lines: - text - text - text I see green lines + same text or slightly changed ^m + same text or slightly changed ^m + same text or

[git-users] Re: git log --graph --all makes top line fall of screen.

For today I am fed up with mintty/git bash which is slow, and buggy as hell, and cmd.exe looks terrible and has no nice colors. Time to try something else: Windows 11 powershell and this: posh-git by dahlbyk Maybe this will be better, time to find out ! =D

[git-users] Re: git log --graph --all makes top line fall of screen.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. POWERSHELL + GIT-POSH SOLVES IT !!! Q stays on the same line ! HAHAHAHAHAHA MICROSOFT+POSH JUST OWNED YOU LINUX BITCHES. BUT NOW ALL IS WELL THE COLORS ARE A LITTLE BIT LESS BEAUTIFULL CYBERPUNKY... MAYBE I CHANGE THAT LATER MAYBE NOT... CONTINUEING. BYE, SKYBUCK. --

Re: [SUBVERSION?] (was: [git-users] A more advanced git system with working trees per commit.)

OH MORE POTENTIAL TROUBLE AHEAD see what I mean... A commenter mentioned this does not work on windows 11 ?!? It did work on Windows 10... Well I am going to try it anyway... need this to work. Bye, Skybuck. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[git-users] git log --graph --all makes top line fall of screen.

The top line head-> and such falls of the screen in mintty. This is kinda annoying, this makes me have to scroll up and down scroll up to see head and other branch names scroll down to see command line. Is there a fix for this ? So git log --graph --all follow by :Q saves some lines at the

[git-users] Re: git log --graph --all makes top line fall of screen.

t;winpty" may be a binary file. See it anyway? sh: /etc/profile.d/aliases.sh: line 25: syntax error near unexpected token `;;' sh: /etc/profile.d/aliases.sh: line 25: ` ;;' Skybuck@DESKTOP-0T9FP82 MSYS /usr/bin $ Bye, Skybuck. On Thursday, December 30, 2021 at 8:38:53 AM UTC+1 skybuck2000

[git-users] Re: GIT FUCKING SUCKS, ONE WORKING COPY IS NOT ENOUGH.

ANOTHER NICE EXAMPLE WHY GIT SUCKS. IT'S NOW COPIEING THE ENTIRE HISTORY. NOOO MOTHERFUCKERS I JUST NEED ONE FUCKING VERSION FUCKING IDIOTS LOL. BYE, SKYBUCK. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To

[git-users] Re: GIT FUCKING SUCKS, ONE WORKING COPY IS NOT ENOUGH.

LISTEN UP YOU MOTHERFUCKERS I JUST CREATED THIS FOLDER ON MY WINDOWS: PascalCoinGit(For Copy Operations) NOW BECAUSE LINUX/SH/BASH SUCKS SO MUCH I HAVE TO TYPE THIS COMPLETELY IN GIT BASH AND SHIT. WORK ON TAB FEATURE SO IT IS AUTO-COMPLETED OR UPGRADE/UPDATE GIT TO HAVE MULTIPLE WORKING

[git-users] Re: GIT FUCKING SUCKS, ONE WORKING COPY IS NOT ENOUGH.

ANOTHER REASON WHY GIT CLONE SUCKS IS IT IMPLIES A SERVER/GITHUB SOMEWHERE FUCK THAT. I SHOULD BE ABLE TO WORK LOCAL ONLY. HOW THE FUCK I CLONE A GIT REPOSITORY FROM LOCAL TO LOCAL NEED MORE COMMANDS HAHAHAHAHAHAH BYE, SKYBUCK. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

[git-users] GIT FUCKING SUCKS, ONE WORKING COPY IS NOT ENOUGH.

ONE FUCKING WORKTREE ?!?!?!? WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU EINSTEIN ?!?!?!? YOU EDIT/MODIFY EVERYTHING PERFECTLY THE FIRST FUCKING TIME I DONT THINK SO MOTHERFUCKER. I NEED MULTIPLE WORKING TREES. LIKE ONE FOR 5 COMMITS AGO LIKE ONE FOR 2 COMMITS AGO LIKE ONE FOR NOW. AND NO I DONT WANT TO CD..

[git-users] Re: GIT FUCKING SUCKS, ONE WORKING COPY IS NOT ENOUGH.

MIGHT AS WELL COPY THE ENTIRE REPO... IDIOTS ON THE INTERNET TELLING PEOPLE TO USE GIT CLONE FOR THAT HAHAHAH STUPID. DO YOU SEE NOW WHY COPY & PASTE IS SUPERIOR. I BET YOU DONT EVEN HAVE A COMMAND FOR IT IN GIT GIT COPY GIT PASTE FUCK YOU BYE, SKYBUCK. -- You received this message

[git-users] Re: GIT FUCKING SUCKS, ONE WORKING COPY IS NOT ENOUGH.

SOME IDIOT ON THE INTERNET MENTIONED TO USE WORKTREE COMMAND I BET THAT OVERWRITES THE DEFAULT AND FUCKS UP PEOPLE REPOSITORY, PRETTY FUCKING STUPID... BUT IT DOES APPEAR GIT HAS SUPPORT FOR MULTIPLE WORKING TREES: Git - git-worktree Documentation (git-scm.com)

[git-users] A more advanced git system with working trees per commit.

Now this is something to my liking. A git system where each commit and each branch has it's own working tree ?! A tool which automates this would be great ! It should work as follows: 1. when a new branch is created create work tree for it in a sub folder 2. when a new commit is created or

[git-users] Re: GIT FUCKING SUCKS, ONE WORKING COPY IS NOT ENOUGH.

NOW YOU UNDERSTAND WHY: A more advanced git system with working trees per commit. A more advanced git system with working trees per commit. Now this is something to my liking. A git system where each commit and each branch has it's own working tree ?! A tool which automates this would be

[git-users] Re: git log --graph --all makes top line fall of screen.

This may solve the white commit hash id problem: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11515089/why-no-yellow-in-powershell-and-posh-git " It turns out PowerShell's console renders System.ConsoleColor.DarkYellow as white: [Enum]::GetValues([ConsoleColor]) | %{ Write-Host $_ -ForegroundColor $_ }

[git-users] GIT: Split file into multiple files, then detect changes in updated original file and apply to multiple files.

GIT: Split file into multiple files, then detect changes in updated original file and apply to multiple files. File Original contains: ObjectA Some funtions for Object A some more functions for Object A ObjectB Some functions for Object B some more functions for Object B ObjectC Some

[git-users] Re: Removing origin/master from local repository after github master rename ?

(up to date) TestPascalCoinMaster pushes to TestPascalCoinMaster (up to date) E:\SourceCode\PascalCoinGit\PascalCoin> git branch -r Yup now it shows it's gone ! Case solved ! =D Bye, Skybuck. On Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 2:06:37 AM UTC+1 skybuck2000 wrote: > Another

[git-users] Re: Removing origin/master from local repository after github master rename ?

Also I see this file master in E:\SourceCode\PascalCoinGit\PascalCoin\.git\refs\remotes\origin Perhaps delete this file to get rid of it ? Is this safe ? :) There seems to be some hash inside of it. Bye, Skybuck. On Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 1:55:41 AM UTC+1 skybuck2000 wrote

Re: [git-users] unable to push to github account

Why does git for humans exists ? How is it different from git for windows ? Is git for humans for more general purposes questions ? or non-platform-related questions ? (To original poster: seems like that exe or other services/exes that it uses needs that framework try installing it, if that

[git-users] Re: Removing origin/master from local repository after github master rename ?

to see if I can find anything else. Bye, Skybuck. On Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 1:57:37 AM UTC+1 skybuck2000 wrote: > Also I see this file > > master > > in > > E:\SourceCode\PascalCoinGit\PascalCoin\.git\refs\remotes\origin > > Perhaps delete this file to g

[git-users] Re: Removing origin/master from local repository after github master rename ?

... Bye, Skybuck. On Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 2:02:32 AM UTC+1 skybuck2000 wrote: > I tried moving this master file elsewhere it had some effect on the graph > but even after moving > git branch -r > still shows it... > so there is more to it... > > The hash pointed to

[git-users] Using * and - to scroll up and down ?

This toshiba laptop L670 is starting to annoying me... The page up/page down keys are all the way at the top of the keyboard above the numpad. I constantly end-up pressing * and - in an attempt to scroll. It could be usefull to give git an option to use * and - for scroll up/down when for

[git-users] Re: Removing origin/master from local repository after github master rename ?

21, 2021 at 1:42:32 AM UTC+1 skybuck2000 wrote: > Hello, > > After renaming the github default branch "origin/master" to > "origin/SkybuckMaster" I notice that on the local repository there is still > some left over origin/master. > > When typing for ex

[git-users] Re: unable to push to github account

You might be in luck, I noticed this weird mingw stuff as well in windows 11 where I installed a new version of git. The version without any problem that I am using is: git version 2.29.2.windows.2 For now I believe the problem might be the following: 1. The latest git installer does

[git-users] Synchrozining and versioning "linked files"/"dependencies" language neutral/independent

Programming languages like C, Delphi, Python, Java, C#, C++ and others often have include and import and use clausules and such in their program files. For example: include "filea.h"; uses fileb; import graphics; These pieces of synthax describe how the files are linked together and how they

[git-users] Integrating GIT with my own versioning system.

My own versioning system is very simple and used for solo development 99.9%. I will give an example of how this works. The main thing is "folders", "version number in folders" and "comments in folders". For example, let's suppose I want to test an algorithm called "Jack". I would create

[git-users] !!! RED ALERT: SHIELDS UP, TROJAN SOURCE HAS ARRIVED !!!

I haven't even read this document fully yet, but all signs point to MAJOR TROUBLE AHEAD for open source projects: https://www.trojansource.codes/trojan-source.pdf My recommendation is to hold all patches/pull requests until solutions/defense/shields are found ! Bye for now, Skybuck. --

[git-users] Re: Integrating GIT with my own versioning system.

ssibility of version conflicts in a more free system (where multiple users end up using the same versions for their own evolved versions...) Bye for now, Skybuck. On Sunday, October 31, 2021 at 7:31:54 AM UTC+1 skybuck2000 wrote: > There remains one big problem with this idea. > > By usin

[git-users] Re: Integrating GIT with my own versioning system.

sibility: "upload all or most or desired" version folders. However GIT does not seem to like this much ? Is it possible to "instruct" GIT to do it's thing based on version folders ? That would be somewhat cool ! Bye, Skybuck. On Sunday, October 31, 2021 at 6:14:40 AM UTC+

Re: [git-users] Integrating GIT with my own versioning system.

On Sunday, October 31, 2021 at 2:27:29 PM UTC+1 o...@ucm.es wrote: > I have to admit, I am a bit lost in your description. A couple of remarks, > though. > I thought it was simple enough but ok, I will try and give a procedural description and some further explanations. The procedural for

Re: [git-users] Integrating GIT with my own versioning system.

the Git repo built. At least it gives a better overview, though the > diffs can be terrible. > Why were the diffs terribles to many code changes all at once ? Git is especially good in collaborative work, without some top knob > being in 'control'. The hash is simple and unique and avoids

Re: [git-users] Integrating GIT with my own versioning system.

> > I bet Git > feels like one of those taxi rides through an unfamiliar city.. > The GIT bash feels a bit cyber-punk-ish =D It feels very cool, though there are plenty of git bash/text/gui bugs and flickers and issues as well as the editor. I particularly like the git log --graph --all

[git-users] Command to display current branch tracking information ?

It would be usefull if there was a command to see the tracking information for the current branch, if any. Right now I am trying to figure out if any tracking is set for the local branch to some kind of remote branch. There does not seem to be a command for it ? I know there are other

[git-users] Why is this window annyoingly small on to the bottom right ?

Text windows should always be center, and big... Eye strain is a real thing... and this is kinda annoying and feels retarded... sorry... got used to it, but it's inconstant with other newsgroups where the window is center and big ?! Is window setting a google specific thing and if so why ?

Re: [git-users] GIT failed to checkout the linux kernel on a 6 GB system

On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 11:16:34 AM UTC+1 Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:01:36PM -0800, skybuck2000 wrote: > > > I would like to report that GIT failed to checkout the linux kernel on a > 6 > > GB system. > > > > For now

Re: [git-users] GITK: Useability issue, can't scroll through fie list ?

On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 11:07:39 AM UTC+1 Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:55:38PM -0800, skybuck2000 wrote: > > > I see two issues right now: > > [...] > > Please stop reporting bugs on this list. > Perhaps I will, however

Re: [git-users] Re: Make git aware of which machine did the git commits ?

Failed: Skybuck@DESKTOP-0T9FP82 MSYS /e/SourceCode/PascalCoinGit/PascalCoin (AddThreadInfo) $ git config --global commit.template C:\Tools\Git\CustomUserSettings\.gitmessage Skybuck@DESKTOP-0T9FP82 MSYS /e/SourceCode/PascalCoinGit/PascalCoin (AddThreadInfo) $ git commit fatal: could not read

[git-users] Re: Somehow git stash lost my changes.

One more thing: Assuming git stash worked the way I thought it would work I was wondering what would happen if a re-base a "stashed" branch. Well I guess we'll never know that answer for now =D My hope ofcourse would be that it moves with it... Bye, Skybuck. -- You received this message

Re: [git-users] Re: Make git aware of which machine did the git commits ?

On Monday, December 6, 2021 at 9:34:52 AM UTC+1 Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 09:03:53AM -0800, Philip Oakley wrote: > > > Set up different 'username' on the two machines (or committer / author > > difference, etc). > > [...] > > ...also do not forget that it's OK to

Re: [git-users] Re: Make git aware of which machine did the git commits ?

This is less easy then it seemed, I decided to remove the environment line just to save one line... but somehow the new lines are showing up as ^M... in vim(?) that kinda annoying: ^M ^M Operating System: Windows 7 Home Edition^M Virtualization Layer: VMWare Workstation 15^M Virtual Operating

Re: [git-users] Re: Make git aware of which machine did the git commits ?

I will give this a try, I hope it doesn't mess up other things, weird: git config --global core.autocrlf true I guess the problem was that the file is coming from windows ? But so what ? vim can store any character in it it wants but apperently it stores windows characters in it on save and

Re: [git-users] Re: Make git aware of which machine did the git commits ?

First I set this back to default which is false according to stack overfow. Would be nice if git has a restore setting to default option or something, cause if stackoverflow is wrong I am screwed, don't like relieing on history/stackoverflow... git could have changed after many years... kinda

[git-users] Re: Make git aware of which machine did the git commits ?

Two reasons: 1. For fun 2. In case anything goes wrong, in case it's caused by machine differences. 3. In case I want to know on what machine the git commit was done in case I need to go back to that repository, in case other repositories on other machines went wrong somehow and in case that

Re: [git-users] Re: Make git aware of which machine did the git commits ?

> > Will this be parseable by the tools you mentioned: Machine:Windows 11 Workstation Pro Or will spaces in the value cause problems ? and should it be made: Machine:"Windows 11 Workstation Pro" ? Perhaps a comment should be added in front ? # Machine: "Windows 11 Workstation Pro" but I

Re: [git-users] Re: Make git aware of which machine did the git commits ?

Then again, those lamps were old if I recall correctly, perhaps there was only one lamp still burning... I replaced one big lamp on top left side, two lamps in there they going strong. Other big lamp on top right side... also two lamps in it... one probably died a while ago.. and maybe

[git-users] Re: Somehow git stash lost my changes.

This is the first time I tried to do multi git stashes and it went horribly wrong because I did not understand how git stash works in this case. My assumption and hope was that the "stash" was stored per branch. So when I would switch back to the branch where the "stash" was stored and I would

Re: [git-users] Re: Make git aware of which machine did the git commits ?

I would like to add something like this: Environment: Operating System: Windows 7 Home Edition Virtualization Layer: VMWare Workstation 15 Virtual Operating System: Windows 11 Workstation Pro Computer: Toshiba Laptop L670 This will help me remember in what environment I made these software

Re: [git-users] Re: Make git aware of which machine did the git commits ?

Concerning the broken lamps, my best hypothesis is the upstair neighbours banging the floor/ceiling to hard causing these lamps to fail again or maybe there is a slight short somewhere, but it's most likely the upstair neighbours I was a bit pissed the last few days, the banging the ceiling a

[git-users] Somehow git stash lost my changes.

Here is the log of today, I remove the git log --graph --all to keep it shorter: The file changes you see below are lost, how did this exactly happen ? (I can guess but I would rather have an expert look at it): (I don't like git stash much, maybe it should be called git stash push, just

Re: [git-users] Re: Make git aware of which machine did the git commits ?

I tried to re-process it with vim: vim C:/Tools/Git/CustomUserSettings/.gitmessage Also command to set it was: git config --global commit.template C:/Tools/Git/CustomUserSettings/.gitmessage Problem with ^M remains, strangely enough, how hard is it to put some new lines in a text file and

[git-users] Re: Somehow git stash lost my changes.

Oh this is odd: Apperently git did not loose it confusing it is in there somewhere: Skybuck@DESKTOP-0T9FP82 MSYS /e/SourceCode/PascalCoinGit/PascalCoin (AddThreadInfo) $ git stash show src/core/ULog.pas| 2 +- src/core/UNetProtocol.pas| 12

[git-users] Re: GIT failed to checkout the linux kernel on a 6 GB system

ould be very usefull if GIT could display which limit was hit and caused the failure/error. Ofcourse it would be better if GIT tries to function within these limitations so it does not error. Bye for now, Skybuck. On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 6:01:36 AM UTC+1 skybuck2000 wrote: > Hello, &

[git-users] Re: GITK: Useability issue, can't scroll through file list with arrow key ?

? Hmmm not entirely clear what this means haha. Some special permission given to users of the group or something ? Bye for now, Skybuck. On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 6:56:53 AM UTC+1 skybuck2000 wrote: > How can I add a label to my postings ? I see labels on google groups. > > I

[git-users] GIT failed to checkout the linux kernel on a 6 GB system

Hello, I would like to report that GIT failed to checkout the linux kernel on a 6 GB system. For now I believe it ran out of memory. I only tried once. PAGEFILE.SYS on this system was disabled. Apperently GIT relies on PAGEFILE.SYS to cover any out of memory situations. This kinda sucks. My

[git-users] Re: Command to display current branch tracking information ?

Thanks ! Your command: git rev-parse --abbrev-ref --symbolic-full-name @{u} Works by replacing with the current branch name or any local branch name. (Does not seem to work with any remote branch name) So far this limitation seems ok for now though if it could find any remote branch name

[git-users] GITK: Useability issue, can't scroll through fie list ?

I see two issues right now: 1. git gui does not have a link to gitk ? 2. I don't like clicking a lot with my mouse, hurts my finger, costs energy, and this mouse clicks badly, have to push it pretty hard, problem right now/useability issue with gitk: 2.1 clicking on right bottom view where it

[git-users] Re: GITK: Useability issue, can't scroll through file list with arrow key ?

How can I add a label to my postings ? I see labels on google groups. Is this done by somebody else or can I do it myself ? Bye, Skybuck. On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 6:55:38 AM UTC+1 skybuck2000 wrote: > I see two issues right now: > > 1. git gui does not have a link to gitk ?

[git-users] Rebase documentation is not clear enough.

https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Branching-Rebasing I believe git rebase must be done from the branch which is to be re-based. So it's always necessary to git switch It is not possible to go to git switch and then do git rebase etc This will not work and go wrong correct ?!? If so, then

[git-users] Re: GIT: Split file into multiple files, then detect changes in updated original file and apply to multiple files.

LittleFile2 LittleFile3 There seem to be some git plumbing commands. Maybe there is some plumbing command that can help with this. Bye for now, Skybuck. On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 1:30:48 AM UTC+1 skybuck2000 wrote: > GIT: Split file into multiple files, then detect changes in upda

[git-users] Driving a little train (dot/point/circle) across the branches.

It would be nice if there was some kind of train/vehicle/dot/point/circle that could be moved across the branches. For example on the output of git log --graph --all. By using the cursor keys the train/dot can then be moved up,down,left,right. Left,Right to change/choose branch, Up/Down to

Re: [git-users] Driving a little train (dot/point/circle) across the branches.

On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 5:29:59 PM UTC+1 Magnus Therning wrote: > > Maybe https://jonas.github.io/tig/ fits the bill. > > >From the description and visuals it seems like this may allow to drive around like a choo choo train, but with extras... not yet sure I like the extras... I

Re: [git-users] Is it possible to apply git versioning/diffing algorithm to multiple files which are the same file ?

> > > What I would like also is for these differences to be visible on > > github/commits. > > This is not possible due to the reasons I have presented above. > > I am going to assume you did not read the rest of my post or it wasn't clear. So I will repeat the "minimum" idea I had to make

Re: [git-users] Is it possible to apply git versioning/diffing algorithm to multiple files which are the same file ?

On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 9:49:49 AM UTC+1 Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 11:12:08PM -0800, skybuck2000 wrote: > > >> There's no such support built into Git (because this simply goes > >> perpendicular to its data model, where multip

[git-users] Re: GIT failed to checkout the linux kernel on a 6 GB system

Oh, Oh... So while I was waiting for the linux kernel to checkout I was reading some random stuff about operating systems, or mostly linux boot loaders other os loaders and some people on github involved with linux and then I switch back to the linux checkout and I notice this: new@new-PC

[git-users] Is it possible to apply git versioning/diffing algorithm to multiple files which are the same file ?

So suppose I have a repo which is like this: version1.txt version2.txt version3.txt All three files are actually the same file. Is it possible to tell git that version3.txt was based on version2.txt and version2.txt was based on version1.txt and that it should apply it's difference engine

Re: [git-users] Re: GIT failed to checkout the linux kernel on a 6 GB system

Hi, My latest hypothesis what might have happened during that normal git checkout on linux kernel is that there was some kind of memory fragmentation and windows could not return enough memory. Test programs could be written to test this hypothesis but I have no time for this. Bye,

[git-users] Improved Solution for Ukraine vs Russia

Watch these two videos, very important: Professor: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4=3107s Skybuck: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ply4Se_bVws Greetings, Skybuck Flying! P.S.: I am very sorry for posting this off-topic posting, but if this has even a very slight chance of

Re: [git-users] Re: GIT failed to checkout the linux kernel on a 6 GB system

On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 3:54:25 PM UTC+1 philip...@iee.email wrote: > > Am I correct in that the work to make mainline Git use size_t where > applicable > is ongoing? > > It's currently a little stalled, because it's been hard to partition the > problem into small chunks that fit

Re: [git-users] Is it possible to apply git versioning/diffing algorithm to multiple files which are the same file ?

> > > There's no such support built into Git (because this simply goes > perpendicular > to its data model, where multiple versions are recorded for the same file > (well, actually, they are recorded across the content of all the files in > the > project, but let's not digress)) but you can

Re: [git-users] Is it possible to apply git versioning/diffing algorithm to multiple files which are the same file ?

This is a fun post/article which describes the "revision" problem: https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/file-versioning-git/ However this problem is only present in "multi-programmer" projects. As long as only one programmer is working on files for some kind of big changes, this is not a problem.

Re: [git-users] Re: GIT failed to checkout the linux kernel on a 6 GB system

On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 11:42:54 AM UTC+1 Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 06:03:46PM +, Skybuck Flying wrote: > > >> Search for "4GB" in this blog post [1] which discusses the GfW 2.35 > release > >> notes. > >> > >> 1.

Re: [git-users] Is it possible to apply git versioning/diffing algorithm to multiple files which are the same file ?

On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:23:58 AM UTC+1 skybuck2000 wrote: > This is a fun post/article which describes the "revision" problem: > > https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/file-versioning-git/ > > > Read a bit further into it. What I could do is rename the versioned fil

Re: [git-users] Is it possible to apply git versioning/diffing algorithm to multiple files which are the same file ?

One possibility which comes to mind is to go "back in time" and create some more commits/branches or whatever. And spread these different versions over multiple commits. So one commit per version. Very maybe git will then recognize these different versions as being the same file and then it

[git-users] Re: GIT failed to checkout the linux kernel on a 6 GB system

Hello, I am back in this thead on 28 february 2022. I read that linux will soon move to a new compiler/c language version, from C89 to C11 so I thought I would try again to checkout the linux kernel so that I can see what it looks like. But surprise surprise, it fails again. This time I

[git-users] Official Linux Repository cannot be checked out because of illegal "aux" filenames on Microsoft Windows !

Hello, On windows 7 and windows 10 it is illegal to start a filename with "aux". Example: new@new-PC MINGW64 /e/SourceCode/LinuxKernel/linux (master) $ git checkout master error: invalid path 'drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/i2c/aux.c' error: invalid path

[git-users] Re: GIT failed to checkout the linux kernel on a 6 GB system

It doesn't hurt to have a little bit of redundancy, especially for something as "important" as the linux kernel lol: (Copy & Pasting this posting/solution to this thread as well) For now the solution I came up with is to: 1. Trust that this github repository is from "official sources":

[git-users] Re: Official Linux Repository cannot be checked out because of illegal "aux" filenames on Microsoft Windows !

For now the solution I came up with is to: 1. Trust that this github repository is from "official sources": https://github.com/torvalds/linux 2. Clone it. 3. Rename these 3 files remotely/on the repository via github and it's file editing feature, which fortunately also allows a rename of

[git-users] Re: Official Linux Repository cannot be checked out because of illegal "aux" filenames on Microsoft Windows !

Hello, It's me again Skybuck Flying and I am reporting back on my linux kernel checkout experiments on Microsoft Windows 7: I tried two methods, "normal clone" and "shallow clone". During the normal clone I noticed how incredibly slow it was because of "resolving deltas" so I searched with

[git-users] What is/are the adventage of a git diff driver and/or git chuck headers ?

While examining the documentation for git attributes I came across something intrigueing: https://git-scm.com/docs/gitattributes Defining a custom hunk-header The following built in patterns are available: pascal suitable for source code in the Pascal/Delphi language. Defining an external

[git-users] Uploading/Downloading local branch tracking information ?

I have a script called: CreateAdvancedRepositoryTabbed.sh which can be downloaded here: https://github.com/SkybuckFlying/PascalCoin It uses git clone --mirror technique to download all the remote branches (which are local to the server/remote) and to re-create them locally. Then the refs are

[git-users] bash echo ' and ( problem

Script test.sh runs badly in git bash: echo Let's start and echo (convert blabla) Creates problems when run: ./test.sh Complains missing ' to terminate Complains ( How to solve these problems for git bash echo ?!?!?!? I tried git echo "Let's start" But problem remains. Bye, skybuck.

[git-users] Re: Creating attributes file automatically ?

md command added to make this script work in ms-dos/cmd/windows/powershell too: only tested in cmd.exe should work in powershell too: echo Skybuck Flying Here ! echo echo This script create a filter for this git repository echo echo 1. To turn 2 spaces into tabs on checkout echo 2. To turn 1 tab

[git-users] Re: Creating attributes file automatically ?

Slightly better description to hopefully prevent any confusion. Note it's also important to add an carriage return/line feed at last line of script: echo Skybuck Flying Here ! echo echo This script create a filter for this git repository echo echo 1. To turn two spaces into one tab on checkout

[git-users] Creating attributes file automatically ?

Right now I am in the process of following this tutorial to auto-convert spaces to tabs: https://sites.google.com/site/gibekm/programming/git/converting-between-tabs-and-spaces I would like to automate step 3 so it could be placed in a repository creation batch file like CreateAdvancedRepo.sh

  1   2   >