On 2020-01-15, at 9:19 AM, Subbu Subbu wrote:
> How do you select the build software after doing a fork of your source in
> github. How can multiple developers use github.
Github is an entirely different beast than git.
There may be people on this list that can help you, but that's a
On 2020-01-15, at 9:19 AM, Subbu Subbu wrote:
> How do you select the build software after doing a fork of your source in
> github. How can multiple developers use github.
Can you please clarify what you'd like to find out?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Big open-ended questions. I'm sure you'll find this helpful:
https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2
=*+[]+ Marty McGowan 908 230-3739
64 Diamond Spring Dr, Monroe Twp NJ 08831
http://mcgowans.org/pubs/family
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, at 11:19, Subbu Subbu wrote:
> How do you select the build software
How do you select the build software after doing a fork of your source in
github. How can multiple developers use github.
Regds
Subbu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
I'm aware of git, but have not used it myself. Now I want to set up a
static blog site on AWS S3, using [TBD tool, Jekyll seems promising...] to
pump out the HTML etc.
My preference would be a Git workflow that accommodates my heavy (but not
exclusive) use of ChromeOS. That implies (I
Hi William,
Would you simply revert master back to known working state and merge the
feature branch back in at a later date when its fixed and working?
(Wondering if doing something like that messes with the history and causes
problems down the line when merging feature branches into
I've been reading about git-flow and doing some experiments, and though I
am no expert with it yet, I think its a good tool for these types of
scenarios. I have not tried this with the team yet but my idea would be to
use git-flow to create a feature branch locally and push that branch up to
Hello Chen,
it is really a big problem when we have tasks that depends on other tasks.
To avoid this, our PO try to select tasks that don't depend on each other
per iteration. In the next iteration, if the task is done (it includes
code-review, test...), the PO selects a task that depends on
Hey all,
Just learning Git and I am trying to understand the best workflow for our
team. For arguments sake, assume we are using Github for
our private repositories and using Heroku for hosting.
I'd like to have a workflow where our development team commits changes to a
development branch.
Hey Bryan,
in my current project, we use feature branch to do our tasks, i.e. for each
task we create a new branch in the main repository and everyone can commit
in this branch. Once the task is completed and approved, we merge the
branch into the main (master) and delete this branch. With this
Hi William.
Thanks for your reply. Havent thought much about bug fixes, but I suppose
they could be done on master directly. Is that what youre doing on your
current project?
Who is responsible for merging a feature branch with master? I'm guessing
there are no restrictions. I think that
I'm transitioning from svn to git and I'm having a bit of a problem.
I'm using git flow and I can't bring down changes I made.
Here's what I've done. First, I needed to get my svn sources down to
my laptop and init a git repository with them. (I don't mind losing my
svn history, really, I
You need to git checkout develop after you clone unless you specify the
branch during clone
On Oct 28, 2011 1:39 PM, John Green johngreen27...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm transitioning from svn to git and I'm having a bit of a problem.
I'm using git flow and I can't bring down changes I made.
Here's
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Chris Stone nightshade1...@gmail.comwrote:
You need to git checkout develop after you clone unless you specify the
branch during clone
Ok, I did miss that, but here's what happens.
$ git checkout develop
Already on 'develop'
Of course I can do a checkout
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Chris Stone nightshade1...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry about the short reply earlier I was on my phone.
What's going on here is when you did the clone it defaults to master. When
you did git flow init it created the develop branch for you. To get your
test file
15 matches
Mail list logo
