Re: [git-users] remote and remote-tracking branches

2016-03-04 Thread dmgf
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 12:29:58 PM UTC+1, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > > > It depends. If you really want to wipe out any mentions of that branch, > the third command is necessary too: the way remote-tracking branches > work is somewhat asymmetrical to normal branches in that if a

Re: [git-users] remote and remote-tracking branches

2016-03-04 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 03:13:52 -0800 (PST) dmgf wrote: > Are they different objects? > In the Git user manual > it is > written that "your local repository keeps branches which track each > of those remote

[git-users] remote and remote-tracking branches

2016-03-04 Thread dmgf
Are they different objects? In the Git user manual it is written that "your local repository keeps branches which track each of those remote branches, called remote-tracking branches, which you can view using the -r option to