On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 04:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
pavan kumar wrote:
> why git uses branches to work on
Git does not need branches, a programmer is free to completely ignore
the fact branches exist.
> and why it creates a default branch "master"?
Since Git supports branches, every repository must have on
hi everyone,
iam new to git, i have a few doubts.
why git uses branches to work on and why it creates a default branch
"master"?
can anyone give this information?
regards,
pavan kumar.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
