[git-users] Submodule tracking remote master shows modified on super project git status after submodule update --remote

2013-06-13 Thread Adam Strzelecki
In my superproject I have two submodules and I want them to track always master master. Using Git 1.8.2. So I've added "branch = master" to .gitmodules and using git submodule update --remote to pull always recent master. However everytime submodule master is updated, running superproject git

Re: [git-users] Submodule tracking remote master shows modified on super project git status after submodule update --remote

2013-06-17 Thread Adam Strzelecki
Bump, None one knows how to make Git >=1.8.2 not show submodule as modified if it is at exactly at specified at .gitmodules "branch"? Otherwise "git submodule update --init --remote" always make Git show module as modified if the branch gets updated upstream :( Chee

Re: [git-users] Submodule tracking remote master shows modified on super project git status after submodule update --remote

2013-06-17 Thread Adam Strzelecki
"branch" setting introduced in Git 1.8.2 just a hint for git submodule update --remote, and nothing more (unfortunately), right? Then well this isn't really useful if I need to manually update submodule tracked SHA1 anyway whenever branch gets updated :( Cheers, -- Adam

Re: [git-users] Submodule tracking remote master shows modified on super project git status after submodule update --remote

2013-06-18 Thread Adam Strzelecki
Philip, Thanks a lot for detailed info. For now I'll keep using "ignore = all" :> Regards, -- Adam Strzelecki | nanoant.com | twitter.com/nanoant Wiadomość napisana przez Philip Oakley w dniu 18 cze 2013, o godz. 00:23: > Adam, > http://bec-systems.com/site/1020/git-

Re: [git-users] Submodule tracking remote master shows modified on super project git status after submodule update --remote

2013-06-18 Thread Adam Strzelecki
ot;ignore = all". Cheers, -- Adam Strzelecki | nanoant.com | twitter.com/nanoant Wiadomość napisana przez Philip Oakley w dniu 18 cze 2013, o godz. 21:23: > Which is the command(s) you are using that needs the "ignore = all", or is > that figurative? > > From my viewpoin