Thank you again Konstantin for the detailed clarifications! We will
carefully consider how secure our code needs to be and then review your
recommendations.
Greg
On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 3:45:59 PM UTC-8, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 10:00:07AM -0800, Greg wrote
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 10:00:07AM -0800, Greg wrote:
[...]
> WRT 1.b: I am surprised by your comment that private Git repos purchased
> from Github are not secure... they purport to be authenticated and use SSL
> connections. Other than the employees at Github, who's prying eyes would
> be a
Thank you very, very much Konstantin for the detailed reply... you answered
all of my questions and also included lots of great supplemental
information.
I concur with your comments about the "marketing speak" and the "cloud,"
and I apologize for not phrasing my questions in a more clear and c
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:51:18 -0800 (PST)
Greg wrote:
[...]
> 1. A general architecture as follows:
> a. Distributed repository model where local "branches" are
> pemitted and all repositories are kept in sync with "reasonable"
> latency (I believe Git does this; please correct me if I'm wrong
Can Git do some or all of the things listed below? If so, I'd appreciate
some recommendations for each piece of the puzzle... TIA!
I am attempting to select a good SCM for our particular development
circumstances, and Git has been selected for the short-list.
We have a small development team
