[git-users] Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-21 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:33 AM, David Aguilar wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote: >>I know 'git ci' is perfectly fine shortcut to 'git commit'. >> >>Either way, it doesn't matter. Even if we agree that /etc/gitconfig.d >>is what we want, or we add an /usr/share/git/config, Junio is not >>going to a

[git-users] Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-20 Thread David Aguilar
Felipe Contreras wrote: >I know 'git ci' is perfectly fine shortcut to 'git commit'. > >Either way, it doesn't matter. Even if we agree that /etc/gitconfig.d >is what we want, or we add an /usr/share/git/config, Junio is not >going to apply any patch, even if it's what most users want. Please sto

[git-users] Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-20 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:44 PM, David Aguilar wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote: >>David Aguilar wrote: >>> Felipe Contreras wrote: >>> >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar >>> >wrote: >>> >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar >>> >wrote: >>> >>> Will this not c

[git-users] Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-20 Thread David Aguilar
Felipe Contreras wrote: >David Aguilar wrote: >> Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar >> >wrote: >> >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar >> >wrote: >> >> Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own >gitconfig? >> >> >> >>>

[git-users] Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-20 Thread Felipe Contreras
David Aguilar wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar > >wrote: > >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar > >wrote: > > Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig? > >> > >>> You mean people that provide their

[git-users] Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-20 Thread David Aguilar
Felipe Contreras wrote: >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar >wrote: >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar >wrote: Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig? >> >>> You mean people that provide their own ETC_GITCONFIG? If you mean >> distr

[git-users] Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar wrote: >>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar wrote: >>> >>> Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig? > >> You mean people that provide their own ETC_GITCONFIG? If you mean > distributions, their packaging would ov

[git-users] Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-18 Thread David Aguilar
>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar wrote: >> >> Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig? > You mean people that provide their own ETC_GITCONFIG? If you mean distributions, their packaging would override /etc/gitconfig, if you mean people that have already a

[git-users] Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-18 Thread David Aguilar
Apologies for top post -- anybody have a recommendation for a better app then maildroid? Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig? I like the idea. Docs? Also, should this not be done in the C side so that we don't waste time reading the config, and also prevent users

[git-users] Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar wrote: > Apologies for top post -- anybody have a recommendation for a better app then > maildroid? > > Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig? You mean people that provide their own ETC_GITCONFIG? If you mean distribution