Thanks William, Fish, Philip for the quick response.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Fish Kungfu wrote:
> I'm new to Git, so I might be wrong, but it sounds like you might want to
> use "stash" in this instance.
>
> http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Stashing
>
>
> 2013/7/4 Dinesh Vijayakum
I'm new to Git, so I might be wrong, but it sounds like you might want to
use "stash" in this instance.
http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Stashing
2013/7/4 Dinesh Vijayakumar
> Hello Git-users,
> I've a question regarding the use of multiple local branches.
>
> Let's say, I've created
- Original Message -
From: Dinesh Vijayakumar
To: git-users@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2013 5:45 PM
Subject: [git-users] Switching between local Git branches
Hello Git-users,
I've a question regarding the use of multiple local branches.
Let&
Hi Dinesh,
all files that are listed in "untracked files" and "changes not staged for
commit" when you use the command git status will follow you when you change
branch. If you don't want it, you need to commit the changes before
changing branch.
William Seiti Mizuta
@williammizuta
Caelum | Ensi
Hello Git-users,
I've a question regarding the use of multiple local branches.
Let's say, I've created a branch b1 and made some changes like adding a new
file to the branch b1 after checking it out.
Then , I stage the file but not commit it.
Now I find myself a need to create anot