Re: [git-users] Re: Setting up a remote repo when the local is already in course

[Daniel Trezub]

Ok, thanks. So, even if my remote repo is a brand-new one and my local repo
is ages old with a lots of history, after the push the remote repo will have
all my history?

=
Daniel Trezub
http://www.gameblogs.com.br


On 13 February 2011 23:46, Jeenu  wrote:

>
>
> On Feb 14, 5:15 am, Daniel Trezub  wrote:
> > It's always good to have your release/master branch to have a linear
> >
> > > history.
> >
> > Why? Does it make things easier when pushing to the remote repo?
>
> It's got nothing to do with pushing. It's just that your graph will
> look tidy and it'll more readable as well. Git will push your commit
> graph to the server however it looks.
>
> --
> Jeenu
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Git for human beings" group.
> To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.

Re: [git-users] Re: Setting up a remote repo when the local is already in course

[Daniel Trezub]

Hi, guys.

Some other questions:

It depends a bit on what you already have on your live site.
>

Why? My live site is supposed to be the same version from my master branch
in my local repo.

4) Clear out the live server (or move the old contents away or something)
>

But this way I'll have a downtime in my site :(

It's always good to have your release/master branch to have a linear
> history.
>

Why? Does it make things easier when pushing to the remote repo?

I've found this method, with uses only git and warrant no downtime:

http://joemaller.com/990/a-web-focused-git-workflow/

Now, my question is about the remote way of live with git: when I
merge/rebase to a remote/origin/master branch, git only updates my local
copy of this branch, right? I should use "git push" to send the changes to
the server or it'll do it automatically?

Thanks a lot!

Daniel Trezub

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.