On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:14 AM, wrote:
> The most sigificant patch uses Facebook's watchman daemon[1] to monitor
> the repository work tree for changes. This makes allows git status
> to avoid traversing the entire work tree to find changes.
Some comments on this series. I still haven't been ab
Hello,
when I’m using the HTTPS protocol to access repositories, a window
from /usr/bin/qt4-ssh-askpass comes up. It asks for my “SSH pass
phrase”, twice. Sadly, it’s wrong. The actual things it wants is the
username in the first case, and the password used to access the remote
repository (eg.
Felipe Contreras wrote:
> == git update ==
>
> Another proposed solution is to have a new command: `git update`. This
> command would be similar to `git pull --ff-only` by default, but it
> could be configured to do merges instead, and when doing so in reverse.
And here it is:
https://github.com
Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
> when I’m using the HTTPS protocol to access repositories, a window
> from /usr/bin/qt4-ssh-askpass comes up. It asks for my “SSH pass
> phrase”, twice. Sadly, it’s wrong. The actual things it wants is the
> username in the first case, and the password used to ac
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Jeff King writes:
>
>> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:04:05AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> Arguably if the user explicitly limited the range, he knows what he's
>>> looking at. Admittedly, I don't know offhand which options _will_
>>> produce boundary commit indication
Hi,
Is there a trick to optimising a push by telling the receiver to pick up
missing objects from some other repo on its own server, to cut down even
more on network traffic?
So, hypothetically,
git push user@host:repo1 --look-for-objects-in=repo2
I'm aware of the alternates mechanism, but
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:04 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
>> I'd actually be inclined to say the opposite of what Junio is saying
>> there: that "-b" should blank the author field as well as the commit
>> sha1. I'd even go so far as to say that "-b" should probably be the
>> def
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a trick to optimising a push by telling the receiver to pick up
> missing objects from some other repo on its own server, to cut down even
> more on network traffic?
>
> So, hypothetically,
>
> git push user@host:repo1
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:08:27PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > 3. Just disable the http tests when run as root.
> >
> > I think I'd favor 3. But I'd like to be sure that being root is the
> > problem.
>
> I agree with both the conclusion and the precondition.
Here's the patch.
The proble
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 07:09:37PM +0530, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a trick to optimising a push by telling the receiver to pick up
> missing objects from some other repo on its own server, to cut down even
> more on network traffic?
>
> So, hypothetically,
>
> git push user
On 17:23 Sat 10 May , brian m. carlson wrote:
> I don't believe this is possible. There has been some discussion on
> related matters at least fairly recently, though.
>
> Part of the reason nobody has implemented this is because it exposes
> additional security concerns. If I create a commi
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 12:26 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:14 AM, wrote:
> > The most sigificant patch uses Facebook's watchman daemon[1] to monitor
> > the repository work tree for changes. This makes allows git status
> > to avoid traversing the entire work tree to find ch
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:32:26AM -0700, milki wrote:
> On 17:23 Sat 10 May , brian m. carlson wrote:
> > I don't believe this is possible. There has been some discussion on
> > related matters at least fairly recently, though.
> >
> > Part of the reason nobody has implemented this is becaus
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 12:21:33PM +0200, Ivo Bellin Salarin wrote:
> Well, I'm on Windows.
> using `git version 1.9.2.msysgit.0`.
>
> You can find all the exchanges, recorded with wireshark, of the
> following usecases:
> * git vanilla (not working),
> * VisualStudio2013 with libgit (working)
> *
Sitaram Chamarty writes:
> Is there a trick to optimising a push by telling the receiver to pick up
> missing objects from some other repo on its own server, to cut down even
> more on network traffic?
>
> So, hypothetically,
>
> git push user@host:repo1 --look-for-objects-in=repo2
>
> I'm aw
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 1:38 AM, David Turner wrote:
>> I got "warning: Watchman watch error: Got bad JSON from watchman
>> get-sockname: '[' or '{' expected near end of file". Any ideas what I
>> did wrong? I'm using watchman.git and libwatchman.git. check-0.9.11
>> and jansson-2.4 were installed
On 05/11/2014 02:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Sitaram Chamarty writes:
Is there a trick to optimising a push by telling the receiver to pick up
missing objects from some other repo on its own server, to cut down even
more on network traffic?
So, hypothetically,
git push user@host:repo1
On 5/10/2014 8:04 PM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
> On 05/11/2014 02:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: That's an interesting
> thread and it's recent too. However, it's about clone (though the
> intro email mentions other commands also).
>
> I'm specifically interested in push efficiency right now. When y
On 05/11/2014 07:04 AM, Storm-Olsen, Marius wrote:
On 5/10/2014 8:04 PM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
On 05/11/2014 02:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: That's an interesting
thread and it's recent too. However, it's about clone (though the
intro email mentions other commands also).
I'm specifically int
On 5/10/2014 9:10 PM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
> On 05/11/2014 07:04 AM, Storm-Olsen, Marius wrote:
>> On 5/10/2014 8:04 PM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote: Many of the Git repo
>> managers will neatly set up a server-side repo clone for you, with
>> alternates into the original repo saving both network and
On 05/11/2014 08:41 AM, Storm-Olsen, Marius wrote:
On 5/10/2014 9:10 PM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
1. Clone remote repo
2. Hack hack hack
3. Fork repo on server
4. Push changes to your own remote repo
is equally efficient.
Your suggestions are good for a manual setup where
21 matches
Mail list logo
