The current test files are named one, two and three.
Make it clearer what the tests do and rename them into
LFonly, CRLFonly and LFwithNUL.
After the renaming we can see easier that we may want more test cases
for 2 types of files:
- files which have mixed LF and CRLF line endings,
- files which
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
/* find existing parents */
Historically there are 3 different parameters controlling how line endings
are handled by Git:
- core.autocrlf
- core.eol
- the text attribute in .gitattributes
There are different types of content:
- (1) Files with only LF
- (2) Files with only CRLF
- (3) Files with mixed LF and CRLF
- (4) Files
The following printout gives a warning:
(trace.c, arounf line 105)
strbuf_addf(buf, %02d:%02d:%02d.%06ld , tm.tm_hour, tm.tm_min,
tm.tm_sec, tv.tv_usec);
trace.c:105: warning: format ‘%06ld’ expects type ‘long int’, but argument 6
has type ‘__darwin_suseconds_t’
A
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
We already have a nice-to-use bitmap implementation in
ewah/bitmap.c. It pretends to be infinitely long when asking
for a bit (and just returns 0 for bits that haven't been
allocated or set), and dynamically resizes as appropriate
From: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
Christian Couder chrisc...@tuxfamily.org writes:
+The trailers are recognized in the input message using the following
+rules:
+
+* only lines that contains a ':' (colon) are considered trailers,
+
+* the trailer lines must all be next to each
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Tanay Abhra tanay...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/25/2014 1:24 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Tanay Abhra tanay...@gmail.com wrote:
Use git_config_get_string instead of git_config to take advantage of
the config hash-table api which provides
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Tanay Abhra tanay...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/25/2014 10:15 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Tanay Abhra tanay...@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/branch.c b/branch.c
index 660097b..c9a2a0d 100644
--- a/branch.c
+++ b/branch.c
@@ -140,33
Karsten Blees karsten.bl...@gmail.com writes:
Am 28.06.2014 08:01, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
Karsten Blees karsten.bl...@gmail.com writes:
I still don't like that the invalidation is done in git_config_set, though,
as
this is also used to write completely unrelated files.
I don't get it.
Am 27.06.2014 00:02, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Four mingw series are still in limbo--are they in good enough shape
for Windows folks who wanted to upstream them?
I've now tested the Unicode patches a bit, and I didn't notice a
regression in my use-cases. The patches are good to go, IMHO.
--
Junio,
thanks for your reply and your patch.
Am 27.06.2014 20:31, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
[...]
would be a better workaround that would not break repositories with
large number of references, but it obviously will lose --date-order
option (why would it be even necessary, though? I suspect
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Jason Pyeron
jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
There are two identical files from the same original
parent, but both were
renamed in their own branches. One branch moved the file to
a new folder,
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
Sorry for the http://pastebin.com/1R68v6jt (changes the merge to
1ca13ed2271d60ba93d40bcc8db17ced8545f172, and manually reconciles the merge),
but it was too long to be readable in the email.
git blame HEAD --
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Phil Hord phil.h...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
Sorry for the http://pastebin.com/1R68v6jt (changes the merge to
1ca13ed2271d60ba93d40bcc8db17ced8545f172, and manually reconciles the merge),
but it was
-Original Message-
From: Phil Hord
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 16:09
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Phil Hord
phil.h...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Jason Pyeron
jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
Sorry for the http://pastebin.com/1R68v6jt (changes the merge to
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Phil Hord
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 16:09
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Phil Hord
phil.h...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Jason Pyeron
jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
Instead of using a PATH_MAX buffer, use argv_array for constructing the
environment for git submodule summary. This simplifies the code a bit
and removes the arbitrary length limit.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe l@web.de
---
wt-status.c | 9 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5
Use argv_array_pushf for building the number string for the option
--summary-limit directly instead of using an intermediate buffer.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe l@web.de
---
wt-status.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
index
-Original Message-
From: Phil Hord
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 16:27
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Jason Pyeron
jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Phil Hord
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 16:09
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Phil Hord
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Phil Hord
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 16:27
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Jason Pyeron
jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Phil Hord
Sent: Sunday, June 29,
20 matches
Mail list logo
