Re: [PATCH 4/8] staging: et131x: Remove ununsed statistics

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:37:46PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:59:42PM +0100, Mark Einon wrote: From struct ce_stats; unicast_pkts_rcvd, unicast_pkts_xmtd, multicast_pkts_xmtd, broadcast_pkts_rcvd and broadcast_pkts_xmtd For some reason something adds a '' to the

Re: Sources for 3.18-rc1 not uploaded

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:37:09PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: On 20/10/14 02:28 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: I have to wonder why 10f343ea (archive: honor tar.umask even for pax headers, 2014-08-03) is a problem but an earlier change v1.8.1.1~8^2 (archive-tar: split long paths more

Funny 'git describe --contains' output

Hi, In the Linux kernel tree, commit 0136db586c028f71e7cc21cc183064ff0d5919 is a bit odd. If I go to look to see what release it was in, I normally do: $ git describe --contains 0136db586c028f71e7cc21cc183064ff0d5919 v3.6-rc1~59^2~56^2~76 However, it really showed up first in

no diffstat for 'git request-pull' (was Re: [GIT PATCH] char/misc changes for 3.7-rc1)

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:54:33AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: The following changes since commit fea7a08acb13524b47711625eebea40a0ede69a0: Linux 3.6-rc3 (2012-08-22 13:29:06 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git

Re: no diffstat for 'git request-pull' (was Re: [GIT PATCH] char/misc changes for 3.7-rc1)

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:03:47PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Monday 01 October 2012, Greg KH wrote: Wait, what happened to the diffstat? Does the latest version of git not send out the diffstat for 'git request-pull'? It used to on older versions, I just updated the version on my

git archve --format=tar output changed from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.1

Hi, The way we upload the Linux kernel to kernel.org involves creating a tar archive, signing the archive, and then just uploading the signature. The server then checks out the repo based on the tag, generates the tar archive and checks the signature to make sure they match. A few days ago I

Re: git archve --format=tar output changed from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.1

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:32:12AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org writes: The way we upload the Linux kernel to kernel.org involves creating a tar archive, signing the archive, and then just uploading the signature. The server then checks out the repo

Re: git archve --format=tar output changed from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.1

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:16:27AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org writes: On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:32:12AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: How about fixing kup to teach the let's cheat and let the other end run 'git archive', if the resulting archive

Re: git archve --format=tar output changed from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.1

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:33:52PM +0100, René Scharfe wrote: Am 31.01.2013 18:28, schrieb Greg KH: I tracked this down to commit 22f0dcd9634a818a0c83f23ea1a48f2d620c0546 (archive-tar: split long paths more carefully). The diff of a hex dump of the tar archives shows the following

Re: git archve --format=tar output changed from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.1

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:52:15PM -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: On 31/01/13 12:41 PM, Greg KH wrote: Ugh, uploading a 431Mb file, over a flaky wireless connection (I end up doing lots of kernel releases while traveling), would be a horrible change. I'd rather just keep using the same

Re: git archve --format=tar output changed from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2.1

On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:05:55PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org writes: The number of people this affects right now is only one (me), given that the offending file is not in Linus's tree right now, so he doesn't have issues with uploading new releases

Re: Re-done kernel archive - real one?

On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 04:24:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: Tools absolutely matter. And it will take time for us to build up that kind of helper infrastructure. So being newbie might be part of it, but it's the smaller part, I say. Rough interfaces is a big issue. Speaking of tools,

Re: Re-done kernel archive - real one?

On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:42:14AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 04:24:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: Tools absolutely matter. And it will take time for us to build up that kind of helper infrastructure. So being

Re: Re-done kernel archive - real one?

On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 03:05:41PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:42:14AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 04:24:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: Tools absolutely matter. And it will take time for us

[GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

Alright, let's try some small i2c and w1 patches... Could you merge with: kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/i2c-2.6.git/ It contains 4 small patches, 2 i2c and 2 w1 bugfixes, diffstat is below, I'll figure out how to send the individual patches later. thanks, greg k-h

Re: GIT Web Interface

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 05:59:45PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 02:52 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:44:15AM CEST, I got a letter where Kay Sievers [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... I'm hacking on a simple web interface, cause I missed

Re: GIT Web Interface

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:32:42PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 09:52:48AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 05:59:45PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 02:52 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:44:15AM CEST, I

Re: [script] ge: export commits as patches

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:03:20PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:48:43PM CEST, I got a letter where Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... is there any 'export commit as patch' support in git-pasky? I didnt find any such command (maybe it got added

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 12:40:44PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: I'm still working out some performance issues with merges (the actual merge operation itself is very fast, but I've been trying to make the subsequent update the working directory tree to the right thing be much better). Ok, if

Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:27:38PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:00:04PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: It looks like your domain name isn't set up properly for your box (which is why it worked for you, but not me

Re: wit 0.0.3 - a web interface for git available

On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 02:29:11AM +0200, Christian Meder wrote: Hi, ok it's starting to look like spam ;-) I uploaded a new version of wit to http://www.absolutegiganten.org/wit Why not work together with Kay's tool: http://ehlo.org/~kay/gitweb.pl?project=linux-2.6action=show_log

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.6.2 heads-up on upcoming changes

On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 10:56:33PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: The short command version will change from 'git' to 'cg', which should be shorter to type and free the 'git' command for possible eventual entry gate for the git commands (so that they are more namespace-friendly, and it might make

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.6.2 heads-up on upcoming changes

On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 12:28:15AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 12:09:06AM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Yeah, yeah, it looks different from cvs update, but dammit, wouldn't it be cool to just write cg-tabtab and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.6.2 heads-up on upcoming changes

On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 06:12:34PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: Pasky, what do you think about this change to git log? Here's a slightly updated version. It's identical to the previous one, except that it also feeds the result through

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.6.3 request for testing

On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 05:09:31AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: Hello, FYI, I've released git-pasky-0.6.3 earlier in the night. Hm, fun thing to try: go into a kernel git tree. rm Makefile git diff Watch it as it thinks that every Makefile in the kernel tree is now

git-pull-script hates me

I just updated to the latest git tree, and now get the following when I try to pull from a ssh repo: $ git-pull-script [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/public_html/udev.git/ fatal: I don't like '@'. Sue me. So I drop the @ and then get: $ git-pull-script someserver.org:/public_html/udev.git/ fatal: I

Re: git-pull-script hates me

On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 01:46:27PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: Ok, below is a patch for this. It works, but then errors out with: bash: git-upload-pack: command not found fatal: unexpected EOF So I'm guessing that I have to convince the server owner to update their version of git too

Re: git-pull-script hates me

On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 01:37:55PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Greg KH wrote: I just updated to the latest git tree, and now get the following when I try to pull from a ssh repo: $ git-pull-script [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/public_html/udev.git/ fatal: I don't like

Re: bisect gives strange answer

a18bcb7450840f07a772a45229de4811d930f461) Author: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed Jul 6 09:09:38 2005 -0700 [PATCH] PCI: fix !CONFIG_HOTPLUG pci build problem Here's a patch to fix the build issue when CONFIG_HOTPLUG is not enabled in 2.6.13-rc2. Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Re: git applymbox is too anal

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:25:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: Ick. I'm trying to apply a bunch of patches to a git repo (the kernel tree), using 'git applymbox' and it's just dieing on simple patches that apply with fuzz. Ok, found another one. This time I looked at the patch itself

Re: git applymbox is too anal

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 05:58:18PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Greg KH wrote: Or am I missing some option to 'git applymbox' that I can't seem to find? No. git-apply wants an exact bit-for-bit match. Partly because fuzz is hard, but mostly because I don't like

Re: Is there some way to suppress Cc email only to stable?

an automated nastygram in response. Interesting. Last time this came up, the result seemed to be different[*]. Hmmm... Greg KH didn't say there were no automated nastygrams, just that he wasn't worried about it. I can try it on the next to-be-backported commit and see what happens

Re: Bug in 'git am' when applying a broken patch

On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:17:59AM +0900, Greg KH wrote: Hi all, I received the patch attached below as part of a submission against the Linux kernel tree. The patch seems to have been hand-edited, and is not correct, and patch verifies this as being a problem: $ patch -p1 --dry-run

Bug in 'git am' when applying a broken patch

Hi all, I received the patch attached below as part of a submission against the Linux kernel tree. The patch seems to have been hand-edited, and is not correct, and patch verifies this as being a problem: $ patch -p1 --dry-run bad_patch.mbox checking file

Re: Bug in 'git am' when applying a broken patch

On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 01:23:26PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes: s/enw/new/ Heh, thanks; I wasn't planning to commit this one yet, but why not. Well, it's not good to apply a commit with no actual commit. That never a good thing, and was the

Re: 0 bot for Git

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:29:59PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > Resending as plain text. (I need to tame my mobile) > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Stefan Beller wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > Thanks for your talk at the Git Merge 2016! > > The Git community uses the same

Re: 0 bot for Git

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:29:57AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > > At Git Merge Greg said (paraphrasing here): > > We waste developers time, because we have plenty of it. Maintainers time > however is precious because maintainers are the bottleneck and a scare > resource to come by.

git email From: parsing (was Re: [GIT PULL] Staging/IIO driver patches for 4.11-rc1)

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:59:01AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > =?UTF-8?q?Simon=20Sandstr=C3=B6m?= (1): > > staging: vt6656: Add missing identifier names > > Wow, your sc