On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 04:52:26AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > because I can't find a way to make recent GCC reject C99 features but not
> > old GNU extensions.
>
> Do we use any?
Quite
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 04:52:26AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> because I can't find a way to make recent GCC reject C99 features but not
> old GNU extensions.
Do we use any?
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
St
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> Petr Baudis wrote:
> > [Re: Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s patch]
> > Note that you are breaking gcc-2.95 compatibility when using declarator
> > in the middle of a block. Not that it might be a necessarily bad thing
> > ;-) (although I still
Petr Baudis wrote:
[Re: Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s patch]
Note that you are breaking gcc-2.95 compatibility when using declarator
in the middle of a block. Not that it might be a necessarily bad thing
;-) (although I still use gcc-2.95 a lot), just to ring a bell so that
it doesn't slip
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:54:56AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Index: commit.c
> ===
> --- b3cf8daf9b619ae9f06a28f42a4ae01b69729206/commit.c (mode:100644
> sha1:0099baa
Functions for a date-ordered queue of commits, progressively pulled out of
the history incrementally. Linus wanted this for finding the most recent
common ancestor, and it might be relevant to logging.
Signed-Off-By: Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: commit.c
=
6 matches
Mail list logo