Re: [PATCH] Restore expected list order for --merge-order switch

On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Jon Seymour wrote: > > Is there some reason why this didn't get applied? I think it's horribly horribly ugly. I really don't see the point of argument ordering mattering, and I think the test is broken. Convince me otherwise. Linus - To unsubscribe from t

Re: [PATCH] Restore expected list order for --merge-order switch

G'day Linus, Is there some reason why this didn't get applied? jon. On 7/5/05, Jon Seymour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A recent change to rev-list altered the order in which start points > are presented to the merge-order sort algorithm. This caused > breaks in the t/t6001 unit tests. > > T

[PATCH] Restore expected list order for --merge-order switch

A recent change to rev-list altered the order in which start points are presented to the merge-order sort algorithm. This caused breaks in the t/t6001 unit tests. This change restores the order in which start points are presented to the the merge-order sort algorithm (but leaves the order unchang