Am 16.08.2016 um 10:42 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
That only leaves the conclusion that some of our pathspec
code tries to be helpful and takes a backslash for a directory separator.
Very true. The code that does this is in prefix_filename():
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 05:37:35PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Hrm. I am not sure I agree. At GitHub, for instance, we turn on
> > core.protectNTFS for all repositories because we do want to be a vector
> > for attacks.
>
> I trust you meant "do *not* want to be a vector for
Hi Peff,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 03:10:46PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > > I am not convinced this mechanism needs to be built into git.
> > > Because it happens to be about filenames, git at least has a hope of
> > > making sense of the
Hi Junio,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> > The trick to catch non-ascii depends on core.quotepath set to true
> > (which is the default). You would need to run ls-files with an
> > explicit "-c core.quotepath=false" to be safe.
> >
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 03:10:46PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > I am not convinced this mechanism needs to be built into git. Because it
> > happens to be about filenames, git at least has a hope of making sense
> > of the various project rules.
>
> Both of you gentle people may recall
Hi Peff & Junio,
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 09:57:52AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > I wonder if we already have a good mechanism to allow a project and
> > its participants (say, "me") to declare "in this project, pathnames
> > must conform to this
Junio C Hamano writes:
> The trick to catch non-ascii depends on core.quotepath set to true
> (which is the default). You would need to run ls-files with an
> explicit "-c core.quotepath=false" to be safe.
> ...
> The invocation of "git -c core.quotepath=false ls-files" needs
Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> > > By the way, doesn't ls-files take pathspec glob, saving one extra
>> > > process to run grep?
>>
>> I specifically did not do that, sorry for omitting the rationale from the
>> commit message. The reason why I have that grep is so
Hi Junio,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Junio C Hamano writes:
> >
> > >> +test-lint-filenames:
> > >> +@illegal="$$(git ls-files | grep '["*:<>?\\|]')"; \
> > >
> > > This pattern must exclude
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> >> +test-lint-filenames:
> >> + @illegal="$$(git ls-files | grep '["*:<>?\\|]')"; \
> >
> > This pattern must exclude questionables on either NTFS or HFS+; it
> > is ironic that it is not even
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Good thinking.
>
> Some tests may have to be skipped on platforms that cannot express
> certain paths, but even then they shouldn't ship a file with
> pathname that cannot even be checked out (they should instead create
> and use such a path, protected
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 09:57:52AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I wonder if we already have a good mechanism to allow a project and
> its participants (say, "me") to declare "in this project, pathnames
> must conform to this rule" and help them avoid creating a tree that
> violates the rule
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
>> Some file names that are okay on ext4 and on HFS+ are illegal in
>> Windows. In order to stay truly platform-independent, Git's source code
>> must not contain such illegal file names, even
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Some file names that are okay on ext4 and on HFS+ are illegal in
> Windows. In order to stay truly platform-independent, Git's source code
> must not contain such illegal file names, even if things just happen to
> work on Linux.
Good
Some file names that are okay on ext4 and on HFS+ are illegal in
Windows. In order to stay truly platform-independent, Git's source code
must not contain such illegal file names, even if things just happen to
work on Linux.
One such file name was recently introduced into Git's `pu` branch:
15 matches
Mail list logo