Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add --expand to 'git notes get-ref'

2012-09-05 Thread Johan Herland
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:53 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:58:37PM +0200, Johan Herland wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:48 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: >> > If I'm missing a good reason to keep everything under >> > 'refs/notes/', feel free to ignore the second patch. >> >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add --expand to 'git notes get-ref'

2012-09-05 Thread W. Trevor King
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:58:37PM +0200, Johan Herland wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:48 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: > > If I'm missing a good reason to keep everything under > > 'refs/notes/', feel free to ignore the second patch. > > This has been discussed a couple of times on this list, but

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add --expand to 'git notes get-ref'

2012-09-05 Thread Johan Herland
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:48 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: > The second commit makes the expansion less strict about the location > of note refs. In his initial mail introducing 'git notes', Johan says > that note refs should live under 'refs/notes' [1]. This seems like a > good place for local notes

[PATCH 0/2] Add --expand to 'git notes get-ref'

2012-09-05 Thread W. Trevor King
From: "W. Trevor King" I was recently confused when $ git notes merge -v refs/remotes/origin/notes/commits failed to do (or print) anything. It turns out that note refs must live under 'refs/notes/', so my command line ref was expanding to refs/notes/refs/remotes/origin/notes/commits whi