On 10/13/2014 11:07 PM, Jeff King wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:24:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
[...]
Is your plan to reroll the prune-mtime stuff on top of these? The
additional safety those patches would give us is valuable and they
are pretty straight-forward---I was hoping to
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:52:30AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
Is your plan to reroll the prune-mtime stuff on top of these? The
additional safety those patches would give us is valuable and they
are pretty straight-forward---I was hoping to have them in the 2.2
release.
Yes,
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
These patches are pulled out of the prune-mtime series I posted
earlier[1]. The discussion veered off and there's no reason that the two
topics need to be part of the same series.
These look all sensible.
Is your plan to reroll the prune-mtime stuff on top of
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:24:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
These patches are pulled out of the prune-mtime series I posted
earlier[1]. The discussion veered off and there's no reason that the two
topics need to be part of the same series.
These
These patches are pulled out of the prune-mtime series I posted
earlier[1]. The discussion veered off and there's no reason that the two
topics need to be part of the same series.
The first patch is the same cleanup as before.
The second one uses Michael's suggested verbose function, like:
$
5 matches
Mail list logo