Antoine Pelisse writes:
> I feel like (but I can obviously be wrong):
> 1. The info is redundant. When performing a merge, all diffs (without
> --staged flag) are unmerged
Yes, it is redundant. They are primarily meant as a warning to
anybody who runs "git diff --stat" while their index is not
Hi Junio,
That does make a lot of sense and I would have indeed missed a couple
of things here.
I've been thinking about that "Unmerged" line quite a lot, and I can't
get myself any good reason to keep it.
Would you mind taking a couple of minutes to make it clear ?
I feel like (but I can obviou
It turns out that there are at least two bugs in the diffstat
counting code. This series comes on top of the earlier 74faaa1 (Fix
"git diff --stat" for interesting - but empty - file changes,
2012-10-17) to fix them.
Junio C Hamano (5):
test: add failing tests for "diff --stat" to t4049
diff
3 matches
Mail list logo
