On Oct 30, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:55:36AM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
>
>>> The POSIX standard doesn't currently define a `nothll`/`htonll`
>>
>> typo: ntohll
>
> Thanks.
>
>>> function pair to perform network-to-host and host-to-network
>>> swaps of 64-
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:55:36AM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
> > The POSIX standard doesn't currently define a `nothll`/`htonll`
>
> typo: ntohll
Thanks.
> > function pair to perform network-to-host and host-to-network
> > swaps of 64-bit data. These 64-bit swaps are necessary for the on-disk
>
Jeff King writes:
> From: Vicent Marti
>
> The POSIX standard doesn't currently define a `nothll`/`htonll`
typo: ntohll
> function pair to perform network-to-host and host-to-network
> swaps of 64-bit data. These 64-bit swaps are necessary for the on-disk
> storage of EWAH bitmaps if they are
From: Vicent Marti
The POSIX standard doesn't currently define a `nothll`/`htonll`
function pair to perform network-to-host and host-to-network
swaps of 64-bit data. These 64-bit swaps are necessary for the on-disk
storage of EWAH bitmaps if they are not in native byte order.
Signed-off-by: Vice
4 matches
Mail list logo