Derrick Stolee writes:
> How about we do a slightly different
> arrangement for these overflow commits?
>
> Instead of storing the commits in the commit-graph file as "0" (which
> currently means "written by a version of git that did not compute
> generation numbers") we could
On 4/10/2018 10:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Derrick Stolee writes:
The generation number of a commit is defined recursively as follows:
* If a commit A has no parents, then the generation number of A is one.
* If a commit A has parents, then the generation number of A
Derrick Stolee writes:
> The generation number of a commit is defined recursively as follows:
>
> * If a commit A has no parents, then the generation number of A is one.
> * If a commit A has parents, then the generation number of A is one
> more than the maximum
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> The generation number of a commit is defined recursively as follows:
>
> * If a commit A has no parents, then the generation number of A is one.
> * If a commit A has parents, then the generation number of A is one
>
The generation number of a commit is defined recursively as follows:
* If a commit A has no parents, then the generation number of A is one.
* If a commit A has parents, then the generation number of A is one
more than the maximum generation number among the parents of A.
Add a uint32_t
5 matches
Mail list logo