Am 09.10.2016 um 10:57 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
Good point. I decided to do it at a different level, though:
parse_insn_line() should already receive the line without trailing
end-of-line markers (this was already the case for LF-only todo scripts).
I reused your commit message and touched i
Hi Hannes,
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> [PATCH] sequencer: strip CR from the end of exec insns
>
> It is not unheard of that editors on Windows write CRLF even if the file
> originally had only LF. This is particularly awkward for exec lines of a
> rebase -i todo sheet. Take for ex
Johannes Sixt writes:
> Let me take the opportunity to say
>
>Thank You Very Much!
>
> for the new implementation of rebase -i. I'm using your branch
> rebase-i-extra, and it is such a pleasure to work with on Windows
> compared to the old fully scripted version.
Thanks for testing.
Havin
Am 06.10.2016 um 15:08 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> Hi Junio,
>
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>>
I do not offhand see why we want to be lenient here,
especially only to the left.
>>>
>>> Postel's Law.
>>
>> How would that compare/relate
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> >> I do not offhand see why we want to be lenient here,
> >> especially only to the left.
> >
> > Postel's Law.
>
> How would that compare/relate to yagni, though?
I did need it, though. Blame it on being o
Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> I do not offhand see why we want to be lenient here,
>> especially only to the left.
>
> Postel's Law.
How would that compare/relate to yagni, though?
Hi Junio,
On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > Interactive rebase's scripts may be indented; we need to handle this
> > case, too, now that we prepare the sequencer to process interactive
> > rebases.
>
> Hmph, have we ever given the sequencer instruct
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Interactive rebase's scripts may be indented; we need to handle this
> case, too, now that we prepare the sequencer to process interactive
> rebases.
Hmph, have we ever given the sequencer instructions indented to the
user to edit? I do not offhand see why we want
Interactive rebase's scripts may be indented; we need to handle this
case, too, now that we prepare the sequencer to process interactive
rebases.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
sequencer.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index 7953a05..5e5
9 matches
Mail list logo