Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] post-receive-email: deprecate script in favor of git-multimail

2013-07-22 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes: I think the notice still deserve the ***NOTICE*** or whatever makes it visible enough to distinguish it from the traditional licence non-warranty header, but I don't think we should kill the old script too early. True. I personally felt that

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] post-receive-email: deprecate script in favor of git-multimail

2013-07-15 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Michael Haggerty wrote: Add a notice to the top of post-receive-email explaining that the script is no longer under active development and pointing the user to git-multimail. I think the spirit of this patch is sane. Some thoughts on wording: [...] --- a/contrib/hooks/post-receive-email

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] post-receive-email: deprecate script in favor of git-multimail

2013-07-15 Thread Matthieu Moy
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes: (3) # An example hook ... # # Warning: this script is no longer actively maintained. Consider # switching to ... I prefer (2), which makes it clear to the reader that it is dangerous to keep using the script (since no one

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] post-receive-email: deprecate script in favor of git-multimail

2013-07-15 Thread Junio C Hamano
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes: (3) # An example hook ... # # Warning: this script is no longer actively maintained. Consider # switching to ... I prefer (2), which makes it clear to the reader that it is

[PATCH v4 2/2] post-receive-email: deprecate script in favor of git-multimail

2013-07-14 Thread Michael Haggerty
Add a notice to the top of post-receive-email explaining that the script is no longer under active development and pointing the user to git-multimail. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu --- If you think this is premature or the wording is too strong; feel free to change or omit