Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>> Merged, pushed out, and tested. Ouch. Fails on t test.
>
> It's because the new git-diff-files expects there to be a valid readable
> .git/HEAD, and is unhappy since the test hasn't updated HEAD.
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Merged, pushed out, and tested. Ouch. Fails on t test.
It's because the new git-diff-files expects there to be a valid readable
.git/HEAD, and is unhappy since the test hasn't updated HEAD.
This trivial patch fixes it.
Linu
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mostly done. It actually works from inside subdirectories, but "." at the
> top-level is still not done. Small detail. Will fix later. But it would
> help if you would apply this, since I'm going to be off for dinner..
Merged, pushed out, and tested.
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> The developement history would look nicer if you did the latter,
> but I am easy and can go either way.
Here is.
> > I'd do at least the "git-diff-tree" part and the "./" and "../" handling,
> > and convert at least the "git diff" thing to the new
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> If you use the GIT_DIR environment variable approach, it assumes that all
> filenames you give it are absolute and acts the way it always did before.
>
> Comments? Like? Dislike?
I'm all in favor, at least in the general case. I suspect there'll be som
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you want to take the current patch (which buys you very little because
> not a lot of stuff has been set up to deal with it, but is the basis for
> all future work anyway) or do you want me to polish it up a bit and
> re-submit the whole thing?
T
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Comments: Wouldn't that mean git-*-scripts would not benefit from this
> because git-sh-setup would set GIT_DIR for you even if
> you don't?
As it stands now, yes. But the point being that if people like this, then
I'll just ch
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you use the GIT_DIR environment variable approach, it assumes that all
> filenames you give it are absolute and acts the way it always did before.
> Comments? Like? Dislike?
Comments: Wouldn't that mean git-*-scripts would not benefit from this
At Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:45:35 -0700 (PDT),
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> This is really partly a serious patch, but also just a query whether
> people would want git to work in subdirectories, not just the top-level
> directory.
>
> So you can be in linux/drivers, and if you do a
>
> git-diff
This does only "git-diff-cache" and "git-diff-files", but the concept
should work for any command that uses the working tree.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This is really partly a serious patch, but also just a query whether
people would want git to work in subdirecto
10 matches
Mail list logo
