Thanks Junio,
That looks fine to me. I'll try to find some time this week to create a
follow-up patch for removing pruned commits from the shallow file as
well.
Cheers,
Michael
On 29 April 2013 15:32, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
>> OK, the change the patch text shows looks
Junio C Hamano writes:
> OK, the change the patch text shows looks sensible to me. Can you
> resend it in full, with the log message, your sign-off, and Duy's
> "Reviewed-by:", so that it can be applied?
I managed to reassemble what I _think_ is close to the original from
a few messages by dequ
Michael Heemskerk writes:
> Re-sent to the mailing list because the original was bounced (HTML subpart):
> ...
>
> With the patch applied, the server ignores the shallow line mentioned by
> the server and will not send a "shallow" or "unshallow" line for it back to
> the client. This scenario is
Re-sent to the mailing list because the original was bounced (HTML subpart):
On 21 April 2013 09:56, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Duy Nguyen writes:
> > But the shallow list is also used to compute the updated boundary
> > (i.e. "this client d
4 matches
Mail list logo
