Jeff King writes:
> I probably shouldn't have included this middle patch at all, because
> the interesting thing is what happens when we do turn it off.
Actually, I think the warning is the most important part. With the
warning enabled, people should notice they are doing something
potentially w
Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 01:21:42PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> If we want this warning, would something like the following do?
>>
>> warning: You have set GIT_DIR without setting GIT_WORK_TREE
>> hint: In this case, GIT_WORK_TREE defaults to '.'
>> hint: To
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 01:21:42PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jeff King wrote:
>
> > --- a/setup.c
> > +++ b/setup.c
> > @@ -437,6 +437,23 @@ const char *read_gitfile(const char *path)
> > return path;
> > }
> >
> > +static const char warn_implicit_work_tree_msg[] =
> > +N_("You have
Jeff King wrote:
> --- a/setup.c
> +++ b/setup.c
> @@ -437,6 +437,23 @@ const char *read_gitfile(const char *path)
> return path;
> }
>
> +static const char warn_implicit_work_tree_msg[] =
> +N_("You have set GIT_DIR (or used --git-dir) without specifying\n"
> + "a working tree. In Git
4 matches
Mail list logo
